Wikinvest Wire

Friday Lite

Friday, December 22, 2006

This will be the last post for at least a few days - we will soon begin a weeklong tour of the Southwest not returning until late next week.

Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, Seasons Greetings, Happy Hanukkah, Happy New Year, Happy Kwanzaa, and a belated Happy Winter Solstice.

Should the spirit strike and an internet connection be accommodating, something may appear here between now and the big announcement next week - we'll see.

Big announcement?

One Week to Go

The much-talked-about Guess the Year-End Price of Oil and Gold contest comes to a dramatic conclusion next week. Late in the day on Friday, December 29th, the final data will be collected and tabulated, then collated, cross-checked, and verified, all with the goal of determining a winner to this closely watched competition that, surprisingly, has garnered little attention from the mainstream financial media.

As you'll recall, the nearest combined guesses for the closing price of gold (spot bid) and oil (February WTI crude contract) will be the lucky winner of a free one-year subscription to Iacono Research, where the model portfolio looks set to end the year with an increase somewhere in the mid-20 percent range.
The blue circle above has moved only slightly from last week and contains the same guesses - dlp, WT, Anup, AK, dotditdot, and CR. Anup is closest, followed by WT. A winner will be announced either late next Friday or early Saturday.

Economic Lipstick on Paulson's Pig

A harsh (but probably accurate) commentary by James K Galbraith about last week's trip to China by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke:

Paulson's China policy is easily understood. In the United States government the Treasury represents the interests of Wall Street... And what Wall Street wants from China is what Wall Street always wants: the freedom to speculate (excuse me, invest) in currency, corporate stocks and bonds, and real estate. Wall Street loves risk, uncertainty and volatility. The Chinese don't. This is a conflict. It is not in any sense a complicated question.

Paulson made a power play, based on a threat: open up or we'll shoot. More precisely, it was a power play based on a bluff. Since the bluff was transparent, the Chinese called it. And when they did, the US side folded. The Chinese then completed the hand by giving back a few symbolic concessions, so that Paulson's team would not have to admit to the obvious fact, that the trip had accomplished nothing at all.

For Paulson, a business negotiator, it was pretty much routine stuff: sometimes you win and sometimes you don't. But Bernanke is an economist. Despite his high public position, he is at heart an academic. In other words, he has standards, and a certain amount of professional dignity to maintain.

And last week he had the sorry job of putting economic lipstick on Paulson's pig. More than that: Bernanke had to argue that it was in China's economic interests to go along with Paulson's plan. Worst of all, he had to talk past the Chinese officials, who somehow seemed to feel that they have a better understanding of their own interests. It must have been dreadfully embarrassing.
Galbraith's new book is Unbearable Cost: Bush, Greenspan and the Economics of Empire. It has long been the view here that, when the history books are written, George W. Bush and Alan Greenspan (not necessarily in that order) will be the two figures from this era deemed to have had the most impact.

Meanwhile, Nearby in Thailand ...

Who knows what to make of the Thai government's moves in the last week. This report puts the blame squarely on the guys with rifles and the guys with pencil protectors, or is it visors and green desk lamps?
Soldiers and economists: the last people you want running a country. Thailand's abandonment of capital controls, only a day after they were imposed, was utterly inept. It undermines the country's government, which came to power in a coup d'etat last September. The supposed justification for that coup was government corruption and incompetence. The alternative, however, appears to be even worse.
Recall that problems with the Thai Baht were the genesis of the 1997 East Asian Financial Crisis - something about "once bitten, twice shy" perhaps.

Housing Deflation Search Update

There has been little change to the "housing deflation" search statistics since they were originally published in the summer - an update confirms the continuation of the trend.

August results: 875 for Google, 251 for Yahoo!, and 339 for MSN Search.
October results: 951 for Google, 247 for Yahoo!, and 360 for MSN Search.
Today's results: 889 for Google, 285 for Yahoo! and 304 for MSN Search.

It's still early (not for housing deflation, but for the use of the term.)

Housing Affordability Deflation Update

While the phrase "housing deflation" doesn't seem to be catching on in the mainstream media, based on the combination of this survey (.pdf) of housing affordability and the reigning in of non-traditional mortgage products, it probably will soon.


Of course, in some parts of California the "affordability index" has been modified to include non-traditional mortgage products - that pushed the numbers back into double-digits. The figures above must be based on the old lending standards where you actually had to pay the money back.

Russia and their Oil

What's Russia up to these days? Vladimir Putin seems intent on some sort of retribution for the late 1980s when low oil and gold prices turned the Russian economy into rubble (or, the ruble into rubble). According to this story another Western energy company knows when they can't win.
OAO Gazprom agreed to buy 50 percent plus one share of Royal Dutch Shell Plc's Sakhalin-2 oil and gas project for $7.45 billion, handing President Vladimir Putin another victory in his drive to control Russia's energy industry.

Shell, Mitsui Co. and Mitsubishi Corp. will each sell half of their stakes in the project to Moscow-based Gazprom, Shell and Gazprom said in a joint statement today. Hague-based Shell and its partners have invested $12 billion in the venture, which will be the first to produce liquefied natural gas in Russia.

"You are never going to have majority control under this regime in Russia," said Tim Harris, chief investment strategist for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at J.P. Morgan Private Bank in London, which manages $346 billion. "That's a fact of life," he said. "The resource opportunity in Russia is vast. The risk is political."
It's always about the oil.

Inflation and those Two Guys at the Federal Reserve

It just goes on and on and on - those two guys at the Fed who just keep talking and talking about what they think should be done about inflation. In this report Dallas Fed President Richard "ninth inning" Fisher talks about determination and resolve.
Dallas Federal Reserve President Richard Fisher on Tuesday said no one should question the determination of the U.S. central bank to keep inflation under wraps.

"I personally have no doubt, no doubt whatsoever, about the resolve, first of myself, but of any member of the (Federal Open Market) Committee to be not tolerant of inflation, should it move in the wrong direction," he told reporters.
Not to be outdone, later in the week, Jeffrey Lacker of the Richmond Fed said:
The past year has been disappointing on this score as well.
...
Many forecasters have been saying core inflation will moderate in the near term, and this certainly would be desirable. But such a moderation is not yet evident, despite the two most recent CPI reports. For example, the three-month average rate of change in the core PCE price index has been oscillating between 1.8 percent and 2.9 percent since last year's hurricanes, and stands at 2.7 percent as of October. In view of this recent record, it would take several months worth of data to provide statistically convincing evidence of a moderation in inflation. In the meantime, the risk that core inflation surges again, or does not subside as desired, clearly remains the predominant macroeconomic policy risk.
It's not like the Fed is powerless to slow down the creation of money - how could anyone realistically think that inflation would be two or three percent when the money supply is growing at ten percent? And credit creation? Does anybody know how to control that anymore, that is, if anyone ever wanted to?

Hamburger Inflation in Indonesia

The two guys at the Fed ought to have a look at hamburgers in Jakarta if they want to see what inflation can do to lunch budgets. This story explains:
The $110 hamburger offered by the Four Seasons is made of Kobe beef with foie gras, Portobello mushrooms and Korean pears -- served with french fries, of course.

They're not exactly selling like hotcakes yet, but the hotel says it has sold 20 of the 1.0 million rupiah ($110.1) hamburgers since they were launched this month. "One burger has 225 grams of Kobe beef. It is so expensive because the flavor is really different," said Erwan Ruswandi, the chief of the restaurant offering the gourmet burger.

"The calves in Kobe get special treatment ... they drink beer mixed with milk, vitamins and eat pesticide-free grass. We add foie gras and also some Korean pears. We import all the materials, and they are high quality so it is so expensive."

The minimum wage in most parts the country of 220 million is as low as around $40 a month.
Based on the lunch menu prices around here in recent months, that $110 hamburger may be available in the U.S. sooner than you might think.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

hello from germany,

happy and healthy holiday season to you and your family.

Anonymous said...

Happy Holidays, Tim. I think your comment about the Russians hits close to the mark. They expand and unify their sphere of influence over strategic assets while our brain trust is pre-occupied with shuffling paper around (witness the Wall Street bonus spectacle this year). They are getting ready to stick it to us. Funny thing, I get the impression that most of the world is sympathetic to that idea. It will not be long before Russian resources begin trading on Russian markets. The days of the LME/COMEX funny money business may be ending abruptly. It won't matter what you think you bought or whatever is printed on your paper if a Putin does say 'da'. Once this it apparent to all, it will be the dollar's last stand. And, unlike all the other pretenders, they do have the clout to stand up to us.

Make sure you're all holding onto the right assets going forward.

Cheers.

Anonymous said...

Here's an alternative reading of what just transpired in China:

Bernanke and Paulson went to China to powwow on how to decouple in general without crashing the global economy, not to demand a Yuan appreciation. The evidence? For starters, the Yuan is already appreciating... a lot.

Bernanke and Paulson are no dummies; they know if the Yuan appreciates quickly that will set off steep consumer goods inflation in the US, raise interest rates (also inflationary, especially for consumer debt), accelerate the housing collapse, and suck money out of Wall Street. I'll bet they know the status quo can't continue indefinitely, but they would like to avoid a sharp correction.

The other big reason to go over is as a dog and pony show: keep delivering the party line to satiate Congress and labor interests in the US. Mission accomplished -- they tried, right?

In other news, it looks like there's been a sneaky down-revision to November retail sales... the Commerce Department is now saying up only .5% -- certainly not significant compared to the questions about what inflation really is. Of course, the linked story somehow spins this all as great news, even being titled "Consumers Boost Buying During Holidays".

Anonymous said...

patrick.net made to Wall Street Journal

http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB116709766539059338-lMyQjAxMDE2NjI3NjAyOTY3Wj.html

Renters Gloat Over Housing Slump
Some Who Missed the Boom
Are Feeling Vindicated Now;
Resisting 'Nesting Instincts'
By JAMES R. HAGERTY and GEORGE ANDERS
December 26, 2006; Page D1

The housing slump has been painful for millions of people who work in real estate or recently bought a house.

For Patrick Killelea, however, this year has been one long victory lap. Mr. Killelea, a 41-year-old software engineer, has long preached that it makes more economic sense to rent than buy homes. He recalls shouting "Wow!" when he heard about September's 9.7% drop in prices of new homes.

"I didn't want to gloat," he says. "But then again, maybe I did."

For years, Americans who refused to buy real estate at what they considered excessive prices were ribbed for failing to profit from one of the greatest booms in history. "Are You Missing the Real Estate Boom?" needled the title of a 2005 book by David Lereah, chief economist of the National Association of Realtors.


Dean Baker, an economist, sold his condo during the housing boom and now is renting an apartment for about $2,300 a month.
Now, with the housing market in a slump, renters who sat out the boom are finally getting some satisfaction.

Dean Baker, an economist, believes that the slump validates his decision to sell a two-bedroom condo in Washington's Adams Morgan neighborhood two years ago. Mr. Baker says he received $450,000 for the unit, which he had bought for just $160,000 in 1997. Since unloading the condo, he and his wife, Helene Jorgensen, also an economist, have been renting an apartment nearby for about $2,300 a month.

Mr. Baker concedes that he could have made an even bigger profit on the condo had he held it for another year or so but says it's impossible to time the market perfectly. While some economists argue that the housing slump is nearly over, Mr. Baker insists, "We're just at the beginning of it."

Mr. Baker has a history of forecasting bubbles early and often. He was quoted by newspapers in March 1997 -- three years before the tech-stock bubble burst -- as warning that equity prices were rising at an unsustainable pace.

That track record, he says, shields him from any snickering among his friends about his decision to cash out of real estate early. "Ever since I nailed the stock bubble, no one I know dares to razz me about my investment decisions," Mr. Baker says.

Rich Toscano did get some razzing from friends in early 2003 when he moved back to San Diego after a spell in Austin, Texas, and decided renting made more sense than buying. At that time, "it was universally agreed upon that real estate would always go up," Mr. Toscano says.

"I thought he was insane," says Mike Mannion, a friend who had met Mr. Toscano in the 1990s when they both worked for an information-technology consulting firm. The two friends spent hours debating over meals and coffee whether San Diego real estate was a good buy. In the end, Mr. Mannion rejected Mr. Toscano's warnings. Even though Mr. Mannion's wife, Christina, an architect, was nervous about the possibility of house prices falling, the couple plunged ahead and bought a three-bedroom house for about $580,000 in late 2003.

That proved a good buy. Home prices continued to soar in San Diego through 2004 and early 2005. But Mr. Mannion says he gradually began to be persuaded by Mr. Toscano's arguments about home prices soaring beyond many buyers' ability to pay. Last spring, Mr. Mannion and his wife put their house on the market and wound up selling it for $830,000. Now they rent and don't plan to buy until they're convinced the housing market has bottomed out. Before buying again, Mr. Mannion says, he will consult Mr. Toscano.

Of course, as even many hard-core renters acknowledge, homeownership has some big advantages, including tax deductions on mortgage interest, the possibility of gaining value over the long term and the security of knowing you won't be evicted by a capricious landlord. But some of today's renters say it has been a bad time to buy in the past few years, when speculators helped drive up prices at an unusually rapid clip.

David Jackson, a 26-year-old information-technology specialist, has been railing against the housing industry for two years -- ever since he made a vain attempt to find an affordable town house or condo in Silver Spring, Md. Unable to understand why prices were so high, he began researching the real-estate market and, he says, "came to the conclusion that there was a massive housing bubble." So Mr. Jackson decided to remain a renter. He pays $645 a month for part of a townhouse.

Now that the housing market is slumping, "I feel vindicated," Mr. Jackson says. "But I'm not looking forward to the coming recession." He believes that the housing slowdown and the effects of "a mountain of debt" on consumers will pull the entire economy into a slump.

Mr. Jackson blames what he calls "the housing industrial complex" in general and Mr. Lereah, the Realtors' economist, in particular. Since last year, Mr. Jackson has maintained a blog (davidlereahwatch.blogspot.com) devoted entirely to vilifying Mr. Lereah.

The blog recently offered a $75 cash prize for an essay containing "the most scathing criticism" of Mr. Lereah. Sample submission: "Dr. Lereah is a lying snake with the ethics of a dope-dealing pimp."

Mr. Lereah says he doesn't object to the blog. "There are people who believe it's the end of the world" for housing, he says. "They blame me for being positive."

Among all the defiant renters, few roar louder than Mr. Killelea, who pays $2,350 a month to rent a snug, two-bedroom craftsman house near Stanford University in Menlo Park, Calif. He figures it would cost him $7,000 a month in mortgage payments and taxes if he owned it.

Most mornings, he sits at a small pine table just off his kitchen and scans emails from acquaintances for any bad news that fits his world view. Before he heads off to work at a bank, he posts the dozen bleakest stories to his Web site -- patrick.net/housing/crash.html -- under the permanent headline, "U.S. Housing Crash Continues."

Almost anything grim will do. Economic assessments from Finnish newspapers pass the test. So does an ad from a Michigan home seller offering to cut his asking price $1,000 a day. One favorite posting consists of a spoof of a Realtor ad, showing a terrified woman screaming in front of a hideous house.

A native Midwesterner, Mr. Killelea worked in Chicago in the mid 1990s before moving to Silicon Valley in 1997 to take a job at Sun Microsystems Inc. He was excited about the $77,000 starting salary -- a 55% increase from his previous job -- until he discovered how much housing cost in California. He and his wife, Leah, rented for a few years in Palo Alto before deciding that they might find cheaper housing in Berkeley.

"We spent several months looking at open houses and bidding on properties," Mr. Killelea recalls. "We bid over the asking price, but never enough to win. On the last one, they were asking $395,000 and we bid $500,000. We got a call afterward, asking us if we wanted to raise our bid. We said, 'No.' We thought that was enough. It turned out that the house sold for $530,000."

After losing that Berkeley home, Mr. Killelea told his wife they were calling off the home-buying search. She says she wasn't thrilled. But they moved to a new rental -- their fourth in five years -- and nestled their two children into an upstairs bedroom with bunk beds.

Even though prices have come down a bit in parts of California, Mr. Killelea vows to resist the pressure to buy. Recently he mused on his Web site about why more people don't follow his example. "I get the feeling many wives are pressuring the husbands to buy," he wrote. "I know it's not politically correct to say so, but I think a lot of irrational purchases are driven by female nesting instincts."

Mr. Killelea says his wife has been "very understanding" about his refusal to buy at today's prices: "She can do the math, too."

But Ms. Killelea seems more open to the idea of homeownership. "We haven't really talked yet about when we'd want to start looking again," she says. "I think we're going to need to discuss that."

Write to James R. Hagerty at bob.hagerty@wsj.com and George Anders at george.anders@wsj.com

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP