Inflation in Mexico
Monday, February 12, 2007
Maybe this helps to explain why inflation is only 4 percent in Mexico. They must be importing lots of inexpensive apparel and electronics just like the U.S.
This story($) from today's WSJ is mostly about the growing trade relations between the two countries, but it's hard not to notice the dramatic increase in goods imported from China and the growing trade deficit.Mexico has viewed China as an economic rival for more than 10 years, more so after losing significant market share to China in electronics manufacturing in the late 1990s. China surpassed Mexico as the second leading exporter to the U.S. in 2003, behind Canada. Shortly thereafter, Mexico's attitude started to change.
Tortilla plants in Shanghai - there is irony in that somehow.
In 2005, the two sides began trade-development talks and, with their government's urging, Mexican companies started trying to reposition themselves.
"China is an important market today, and tomorrow will be a more-important market for exporters all over the world. Mexico has to start developing that presence" there, says Roberto Zapata, director general of Multilateral and Regional Trade Negotiations in Mexico.
While Mexico remains competitive in textile manufacturing, the government is encouraging investment in products of higher value, as other competitors such as Japan have done.
"We have come to the conclusion that we cannot compete with China in labor costs," Mr. Zapata says. "The lesson, I believe, is very clear -- to move to the upper end of the value chain."
Luis de la Calle, who was Mexico's negotiator for China's World Trade Organization bid, says Mexican companies are beginning to feel more confident they can compete with China, invest successfully there and even attract Chinese investment.
At the lead are companies like tortilla-maker Gruma S.A.B. de C.V., which opened a $20 million tortilla plant in Shanghai in September to better sell to Asian markets. Auto-parts producer Nemak -- a subsidiary of Mexican concern ALFA S.A.B. de C.V. -- said it would build a plant in China but scrapped those plans and took a shortcut, announcing in November it would acquire a company that owned a parts-production facility there.
"The Chinese market has the greatest potential for growth, given its current underdevelopment and the possibility to manufacture cars for the export market, particularly with Asia," says Enrique Flores, an ALFA spokesman. The company already has a contract with GM Shanghai to produce engine heads for cars sold in the Chinese market.
While they're getting the kinks worked out with the new tortilla factory, all those imported TV sets will help to offset the rising price for corn and other food staples at home when they tally the official inflation statistics.
8 comments:
High fuel costs will soon kill this fantasy-land notion of it being cheaper to make absolutely everything in Asia for shipment absolutely anywhere in the world.
What, cheap oil isn't the be-all-end-all underpinning of globalization? Shocking I say!
Josh
Forty percent of the revenue of the government of Mexico comes from oil production. They are going to get squeezed as their big oil field Cantarell declines. It may not be pretty.
Most of the rest of Mexico's revenue comes from remittances. The housing bust should hit them hard, too.
Then again, Peak Oil should eventually raise the value of the oil they do pump...
Atheist,
I am not a fan of many of our current policies, but looking at this site made me truly noxious – the “Israel caused 9/11” title says it all.
It is patronized by the same sort of people who so hated the US earlier, that they embraced Stalin and Mao, and now are ready to embrace anyone from Osama to Chavez, the more anti-American (not to mention anti-semitic), the better.
When Roberts says
“Such an attack [on Iran] justified in the name of "American security" and "American hegemony" would constitute the rawest form of evil the world has ever seen, far surpassing in evil the atrocities of the Nazi and Communist regimes.”
-he is just raving mad. He is comparing a worst imaginable outcome of a hypothetical attack to real crimes, which is an idiocy. For comparison, Stalin did kill at least 20,000,000 of his own people – 1/8 of the population, plus millions in occupied countries.
This just shows that it’s easy to savagely hate the “bad” you know, and think the evil you know little about is somehow exotic and probably not so bad after all (be it communism or islamism).
Don’t think that those countries most adamantly criticizing the US now are better, they are much worse – I lived there. Some of their criticism may sound fair, but, boy, they would do so much worse if they had the power. As a rule, countries that treat their own people like dirt (China, Russia) will not treat others kindly either -- just ask eastern Europeans.
As a rule, countries that treat their own people like dirt (China, Russia) will not treat others kindly either
You left out the good ol' US of A!
"You left out the good ol' US of A!"
Again, everything is relative. In comparison to paradise (or some ideal we may want) the US looks bad. In comparison to most real existing countries it actually fares pretty well.
So you lived in a bad country, and now you want to come to the USA and scold people for speaking out against the Iraq War; a war that is CLEARLY against the intrests of the citizens of the United States.
We all KNOW that the US doesn't suck as much as Iraq, Russia, China, whatever. You are missing the point. Americans are used and are willing to fight for a level of freedom that is still (although maybe not for long) unrivaled in the world. It is the duty of all Americans to speak out as loudly as possible against anything that may undermine that. Be it the Bush administration, Iraq, Israel or grizly bears.
Post a Comment