Wikinvest Wire

How Times Have Changed, Mostly

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

The "F" word seems to be popping up a lot these days. No, not that "F" word ... foreclosures. As in, "Oh my God, what was I thinking back in 2005? I can't afford this place!"

What you see below is the sort of thing that now finds its way onto the main page at Yahoo! and appears elsewhere regularly on the internet and in newspapers - times really have changed in just a couple years.

At least now, with the number of distressed homeowners rising rapidly, there is much more information available on how to avoid foreclosures. It used to be that the only time you'd see the "F" word was on those little signs by the side of the road.

You know the ones - the little 1' x 2' signs attached to sticks that are plunked into the ground near traffic lights and stop signs. They had a much different message just a couple of years ago.

The stories on Yahoo! reflect the changing mood about real estate in the U.S. and offer some good advice - much better than what you'd likely get by calling a phone number on the sign above.

Six Steps to Avoiding Foreclosure
If you're a homeowner and are having trouble paying your mortgage, this article could save your house and your family's finances.

As I write this, several million Americans are in jeopardy of losing their greatest investment to foreclosure within the next 18 months. But help is available, and there are ways to work with your lender to help keep your home.
...
1. Call your lender immediately.
2. Ask to speak to the "loss mitigation" department.
3. Be prepared to review your situation in detail with your lender.
4. Know the ways your lender can help you avoid foreclosure.
5. Know where to turn if you aren't getting the help you need from your lender.
6. Be aware of the foreclosure process -- and consequences.
The logic of lenders working out a repayment plan or otherwise bending over backwards to permit a homeowner to keep a house that they really can't afford escapes me at the moment.
Protecting Yourself from the Wrong Mortgage
Talk about being late to the game.

After the past few months of mortgage delinquency rates and home foreclosures creeping ominously upward, a lot of government attention is suddenly being focused on the "shocking" fact that many borrowers ended up with nontraditional mortgages they had little chance of affording once the alluring introductory periods expired.
...
Given that we're now heading into the home-buying season, here's what I recommend that every homebuyer -- and anyone contemplating a mortgage refinance -- should consider before signing on the dotted line:

1. Focus on the "what if" factor.
2. Know your limits.
3. Lower your price target.
4. Read the ARM fine print.
Wow! Talk about lowering your expectations - lower your price target? You mean, don't buy the biggest house you can afford because you'll grow into it? This logic worked quite well for generations - up until about 2001 when interest rates were pushed to levels that hadn't been seen in, well, generations.

But, not everyone is aware of the growing number of foreclosures or the rapidly changing mortgage lending environment.

This story on the front page of today's LA Times indicates that in some ways, opinions about real estate really haven't changed. Only a few homeowners seem to have noticed the increasing number of reports on the increasing number of foreclosures that will put increasing pressure on home prices in many parts of the country.
Faith in home values persists
Americans are worried about the economy and believe that a recession is looming, but their faith in real estate remains fierce, according to a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll.

Nearly a third of those polled predicted home values in their neighborhood would increase in the next six months. Only 16% anticipated a decrease. The rest said values would hold steady.

Call it foolish faith or bold optimism, the forecast is at odds with the downward trend of home prices.

The National Assn. of Realtors recently reported that prices fell 2.7% in the last three months of 2006. Many economists expect real estate to have a rough ride this year, partly because of rising mortgage loan defaults.

Scott Richard Wallace, a San Diego carpenter, doesn't share that view. "Housing is always a good investment," he said in an interview after the poll. "I don't see it ever losing."
People like Mr. Wallace are part of the reason why they say real estate prices are "sticky down". Foreclosures have a way of making prices less sticky.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Check out this guy in the Times piece:

David Poulnot, an insurance agent in Charleston, S.C., is not an advocate of aid. Many people may be just one misfortune from disaster, he said, but what they really need is more discipline.

"TV and magazines make the good life look wonderful," said Poulnot, 49. "If you didn't get raised properly, it's easy to fall prey to wanting more than you can afford."

Not him, though.

"I drive a 5-year-old Chevy Tahoe, my wife drives a 6-year-old Ford Expedition, and if my son goes to Virginia Tech he's going to have to pay for half of it," Poulnot said. "But I'm not going to blame George Bush. I think he's doing a pretty good job."

Tim said...

This hilarious White House Easter Egg Hunt video would have been completely off topic, but after the first comment, now it's not.

Anonymous said...

"But I'm not going to blame George Bush. I think he's doing a pretty good job."

Funny, I don't recall Bush or any other evil Republican cheerleading ARM financing - that was the Fed. Separate dumb monetary policy from fiscal policy. Disagree with the war, disagree with Medicare prescription spending, but don't try to blame the White House for this housing mess. Blame fence-sitting regulators and state legislatures for not being more preemptive.

Anonymous said...

The real culprit, of course, is the American people, who for some reason have been collectively making poor choices about pretty much everything for ten years or so.

I do think the Republican program promoting faith-based decision making and Orwellian abuse of language and logic has something to do with it.

Anonymous said...

Wow. A 5 year old Tahoe. Quite the alternative lifestyle.

Tim said...

A belated hat-tip to the wife for the Easter Egg Hunt video.

Unknown said...

I recall a survey back in late '99 or early 2000 where a significant number of Americans epected their stock portfolios to appreciate into infinity at 15% annually. Now we have this wacky belief that home values will go up in six months, even though a third of respondents described their financial situation as "shaky" and 62% expect a recession within a year - proof that many Americans continue to live in a parallel universe.

Unknown said...

Greenspan was appointed during Reagan's tenure. Blaming GWB for our current monetary situation is like blaming Ronald McDonald when you get a bad burger.

Anonymous said...

Well I would rather have had Ronald McDonald running the country for the last six years, myself....

And I think this crash is gonna make the S&L crash look like good times.

Anonymous said...

I feel for Bernanke in a way, he has to try to clean up the mess Greenspan made... Greenspan went way over the line keeping interst rates so low for such a long time, 1-2% for years to try to prop up W's tax cuts and the republican administration. To hear him eulagised makes me want to puke. He let politics and wall street guide his policy by the nose. Clinton should have dumped him years ago. Heaven help us........

Teri said...

Has anyone ever talked to the "loss mitigation department? I have. The folks at First Horizon had me fax them a multi-page document which cost me $27. When I spoke with them two weeks later, they claimed they did not have it and wanted me to send it to them again. I mailed it to them this time. And that was pretty much standard procedure for my dealings with them the next few months. I would update them on the progress of my sale. I'd have to go over the same info again the next time I spoke to them. I had to resend every document to them. At one point, I was two weeks away from closing and they were threatening to foreclose. I talked to FHA who told me the house was mine to sell until it went to the sheriff's auction. And yes, I did close that sale. First Horizon showed absolutely no interest in working with me. They seemed far more interested in trying to claim title to the house than in getting the loan paid off. My guess is that a lot of other folks will discover just how little their mortgage company is interested in working with them.

Unknown said...

LA Times asked the same questions last year, with remarkably similar results:

March 2006

Prices will increase in next 6 mos.: 36%
Stay about the same: 49%
Decline: 14%

April 2007

Increase: 32%
Same: 51%
Decline: 16%

All those changes are within the margin of error. There has been no reaction to the last year's worth of change in the market or the news thereof.

That's why they call it "faith."

Anonymous said...

One of the anonymous posters said "Funny, I don't recall Bush or any other evil Republican cheerleading ARM financing - that was the Fed."

No connection between the White House and the FED?! What alternative universe does this person come from and how do I get there?

Aaron Krowne said...

Isn't it a beautiful thing, that the market can be going through a correction even when 94% of people don't know about or disagree with that correction?

She is a harsh mistress, that market!

teri:

First Horizon is imploding. At least, their subprime unit is. I think they're just trying to stay solvent; their clients apparently come second...

Aaron Krowne said...

Sorry ,that's 84%.

I was thinking "don't type 94%, you fool!"; so of course that's what I typed.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP