Wikinvest Wire

Stop the $7 Billion Dollar Subprime Bailout

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Not having heard the term "exploding ARM" before, but liking it on first sight in Senator Charles Schumer's report on subprime lending, there is much less to like in the conclusion of the report where it is learned that "it pays to prevent foreclosures".

A Joint Economic Committee report titled "Sheltering Neighborhoods from the Subprime Foreclosure Storm" was released yesterday and it seems that Congress is intent on fixing the problem with subprime mortgages, where, over the last few years, people who couldn't afford homes were permitted to purchase them.

Now that they can't make their mortgage payments, elected officials see fit to help them stay in their unaffordable homes for the greater good - it wasn't hard to see this coming.

Here's the first page of the report which came to me via email - as soon as a link can be located, it will be posted here (.pdf) so readers can see for themselves how their tax money may be spent.

The report has lots of maps and tables along with the requisite "tightening of lending standards", but it's the bailout talk that should be examined closely.

What kind of message does it send when there are no consequences for irresponsibility by lenders, regulators, and borrowers?

Conclusion: It Pays to Prevent Foreclosures

Foreclosures are costly – not only to homeowners, but also to a wide variety of stakeholders, including mortgage servicers, local governments and neighboring homeowners. The high costs of foreclosures – up to $80,000 for all stakeholders combined – present a strong incentive to prevent them. In their efforts to respond to the subprime foreclosure crisis, policymakers may want to consider enacting some combination of the following measures to prevent future foreclosures that may come as a result of a high concentration of unsuitable loans in areas of economic downturns, areas of steep housing market slumps and areas of lax regulatory enforcement.

Increase Federal Support for Local Foreclosure Prevention Programs.
In the short term,local community-based non-profits may be best positioned to implement foreclosure prevention programs. State and national organizations exist throughout the country to both enhance homeownership and prevent foreclosures. Many of these programs have been successful in coordinating a wide range of services for borrowers in order to help restructure unsuitable loans, aid borrowers with foreclosures prevention counseling or initiate legal action against the most gregious predatory lenders. 49 Some of these programs also provide financial assistance, such as low-interest bridge loans to help borrowers recover from delinquency. To assist existing community-based nonprofits with increasing caseloads, the federal government should work with nonprofits with proven track records and consider providing them with enhanced funding.50

Estimates suggest that foreclosure prevention costs approximately $3,300 per household -- substantially less than the nearly $80,000 in costs of foreclosure described above.

50 Ana Moreno, Cost-Effectiveness of Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention, Family Housing Fund, November 1995.
Let's see. At $3,300 per household that would be $3.3 billion for every million homes that are saved. Since the Center for Responsible Lending estimates a total of 2.2 million homes of subprime borrowers would otherwise be destined for sheriff's sales, that would put the upper limit just over $7 billion.

The really bad news is that the $3,300 figure is based on a paper that is already 12 years old and likely underestimates the cost by a wide margin. Add to this the possibility of Alt-A loans being added into the mix later this year and the real implementation cost would probably be tens of billions of dollars or more.

Like the phrase named after Alan Greenspan, the former Fed chairman who got this whole housing mess started, maybe this plan will someday be called the "Schumer put" as in, "Go ahead and speculate, somebody will be there to save you if things go awry".

Now is probably a good time to visit Patrick's Stop the Subprime Bailout page, follow the meticulously written instructions and let your elected representative know how you feel about this.

23 comments:

jmf said...

here is a good take from caroline baum

Housing Bubble Accomplices Preparing for Death: Caroline Baum

..Let's hope the committee calls some mortgage-bond investors to testify. If they can be sued for someone else's actions, they aren't going to buy any mortgage bonds. Period. ...

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2007/04/housing-bubble-accomplices-preparing.html

Anonymous said...

The lesson is that if you're going to screw up, make sure it is big enough to get saved by Congress or the Fed.

One or two homeowners getting into this mess is nothing and wouldn't have gotten any attention from Congress. LTCM got attention because it was by itself so big, but the little guy doesn't get that advantage unless there are a lot of other little guys in the same boat.

Basically, if you're small, only jump off the cliff if there are thousands (or millions) of other lemmings doing it at the same time...

-Jason G.

Anonymous said...

The report appears to be up:

http://jec.senate.gov/Documents/Reports/subprime11apr2007revised.pdf

Anonymous said...

Sigh. Didn't we already live through the 80s? It's the S&L crisis all over again....

Tim said...

Thanks for the link.

Anonymous said...

Is it too late for me to go purchase a house I cannot afford financing it with an "exploding arm" and have the government let me stay in it? Sign me up! Isn't it great we can have the Federal Government reward stupidity? What kind of statement are they making when they tell citizens that the Feds will increase the net worth of its dumbest citizens at the expense of everyone else?

Anonymous said...

That would be "reverse social Darwinisn" - is there a name for that?

Anonymous said...

Soooo angry!

Anonymous said...

This isn't going to happen. This is just Congress trying to look like they are doing something. Remember that although there are lot of people out there who will get in trouble with ARMs, most Americans will not. As this initiative gains momentum, people will realize how unfair it is and Congress will not be able to follow through.

What will happen is that the Fed will cut rates, cut them and then cut them again. This will enable to help people keep their houses. See Bill Gross' write up here: http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2007/IO+April+2007.htm

Also this will be popular (or at least not unpopluar) with the American public.

Key thing for us is that no matter what happens, the dollar is going down further. Only chance that this doesn't happen is if the Congress and the Fed allow things to blow up , which isn't very likely

Anonymous said...

I have two letters written over at my blog's wiki that people can use.

http://tinyurl.com/2qcou6

Anonymous said...

Lets see, Bush out did his father in Iraq, and now will out due his brother in housing. When his brother helped create the Saving and Loan problems, the government sold new homes in Texas for around 15k, this time around I will have the cash to pick up a few deals. Go Bush crime family!!!

Anonymous said...

some idiot on cnbc said that we just need more legislation. the laws passed after the s&l crash prevented another abuse in lending

WTF!!!!!

why do we have the housing bubble then.....

Anonymous said...

I sent an email to Charles Schumer reminding him that this legislation would reward the irresponsible behavior of the few at the expense of the many and it takes the votes of the many to get re-elected.

Anonymous said...

Schumer and Clinton are in the land of securitization. Their puppet string pullers made off like bandits. And now they're the champion of the little guy???

Find a tree high enough for Greenspan and Wolfowitz and let's get some horses! Evil people suk.

Anonymous said...

Well, I've been a lurker, but I just called Schumer, Dodd, and my representatives to say no to this idea. Ridiculous.

I actually was a mobile closer for refi's and no matter how much you explained the risk of arm's/negative equity, etc., to people all they cared about was next month's monthly payment. Meanwhile they had just "paid off" their big screen tv and new dodge truck with their mortgage refi. Absolutely ridiculous.

Meanwhile I was responsible, bought a modest house with a fixed 30 year ...

Anonymous said...

The only people who should get any help are true victims of deceptive or fraudulent lending practices. Speculators, idiots, and certainly the lenders, builders, etc, who were DOING the risky loans, should not get a dime, and should be made to pay for their greed and stupidity. It's not right to make the rest of America pick up the tab and reward them for their bad decisions.

There ARE people who were defrauded...forged documents, deceptive business practices, and the like. They are the only "victims," here. The rest should get what they have coming to them, especially since they were the ones formerly screaming that they wanted big govt out of our lives, (when doing unethical business was profitable because the govt was looking the other way while these selfish crooks created the housing bubble!)

Anonymous said...

NO, there are not people who deserve a bail out. If you were defrauded, we have a legal system to handle that already. They can take their case up in court just like any one else who claims to be defrauded.

It's way too easy for irresponsible individuals to claim they were defrauded when in reality they were just as guilty of greed as the lenders.

Anonymous said...

Frighteningly, some type of bailout legislation will be passed. We are living in the mob rule of a democracy and many many people will be screaming for help.

The prudent and smart are the minority. Besides, how can a politician gain power without a problem to solve?

Hillary is already talking about beefing up the FHA.

stuckinthecity said...

Here is a link to my blog. It is mostly for people from Chicago an Illinois. It has links for our reps to say no to the bail out. Pass it along. thanks.

Say NO to the Sub-prime Bail Out!

Anonymous said...

I don't wanna pay for some doooschbag's problem because they cant read what they signed.house value calculator

Anonymous said...

By the way congress and private lenders are looking to create new tools to help prevent mass foreclosures in the ailing subprime sector nationwide.

Anonymous said...

Just wanted to know if this bailout is OK with all of those opposing the real estate FREEZE????

"Senate passes $286 billion farm bill by a vote of 79-14"
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/14/congress.farm.bill.ap/index.html

I hear no outrage about this. The size does not even compare: 7 billions to 286 billions.

Anonymous said...

Don't worry about a bailout. The Feds are giving a green light to the real estate cons, I mean, industry to tap into retirees' retirement accounts through self-directed IRAs. So what if it results in multitudes of retirees being scammed out of their retirement funds. They can just live on social security. As long as it keeps the real estate pyramid going, and therefore the US economy going, it's an easy way for the Feds to keep up pretenses.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP