Telling them what they want to hear
Monday, April 16, 2007
After Friday's report on Producer Prices, in which the overall monthly increase of 1.0 percent followed February's gain of 1.3 percent and ignited a stock market rally based on "easing inflation concerns", it should be clear that the relationship between prices and investor outlook is completely dysfunctional.
And the mainstream media is a dysfunction "enabler".
Sure, when food and energy are stripped out, the result was no change from the month prior and this "core" rate of producer price inflation is purportedly a better indication of the underlying trend when these "volatile" components are removed.
But that's a lot like looking at a burning garage, where the fire has not yet spread to the house, and concluding that the situation is under control.
A look at the 12 month percent change to overall producer prices shows an alarming trend since the beginning of the year when, after oil prices touched $50 a barrel, unrelenting price increases have been seen in all energy products, a situation that has been compounded by the impact that biofuel production is having on the price of agricultural products.
Yes, food and energy prices are volatile, but a simple moving average provides a much better indication of the trend in producer prices than removing major components that just happen to be volatile (and go up a lot).
Equity investors appear to be more than happy to look at a lower core inflation number that tells them what they want to hear - the Fed won't raise rates and the coast is clear.
Reporters don't help the situation. Aside from an occasional "if you don't have to drive or eat" quip, they pretty much go along with what both economists and equity investors want to believe.
This WSJ report($) from Friday captures the mood well.
This Reuters story from the LA Times does the same.
Is this all for the greater good somehow?
Despite the real-world experience of rising prices that individuals see around them all the time, we are all supposed to go along with the ruse of inflation being "contained" so that stocks will go up?
The consumer prices index comes out tomorrow - get ready for more of the same.
3 comments:
Preview Tuesday's one-two market punch at http://infohype.blogspot.com
Ha, it gets worse. Rising prices, especially for gasoline, rather than increased volume, are what drove today's "stronger than expected" retail sales, helping to ignite today's market rally (along with another mega LBO proving yet again how worthless money is becoming). Rex Nutting at MarketWatch actually read retail tea leaves correctly, but MarketWatch's headline writer, ignoring Nutting's nuanced report, treated the report as proof consurmers were "hale and hardy." As I write the Dow just went over 100 up, completely erasing February's 419-point shot across the bow.
I haven't looked at the Retail Sales report other than the headline number, but I remember this from last year and commented on it in Saturday's post on economic reports.
This is starting to feel like the period from late 2005 to mid 2006 again, just prior to the energy sell-off that began last August and extended into the winter. Back then, month after month, rising energy prices showed up in various economic reports in one form or another - inflation data, consumer confidence data, retail sales, international trade - don't be surprised if next week's retail sales report comes in higher than expected due to gasoline station sales, as was the case for much of the 2005-2006 period.
Post a Comment