State of confidence, state of credit
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
In this month's Central Bank Focus, Paul McCulley of Pimco writes that liquidity is really a "state of mind", a point proven all too clearly during last month's Northern Rock debacle in the U.K., according to a report($) in today's Wall Street Journal.
Before continuing the unseemly pleading for lower interest rates (a task that now appears to be part of the updated job descriptions at Pimco), the subject of John Maynard Keynes and his 70 year-old discourse on the "state of confidence" (by speculators) and the "state of credit" (by lenders) is recalled in an effort to better understand what happens after a "Minsky Moment".
A "Reverse Minsky Journey" is apparently what follows these days - where borrowers and lenders alike attempt to gather their wits and once again pour their efforts into creating the next Minsky Moment.
Paul McCulley is often asked these days:“Where did all the liquidity go? Six months ago, everybody was talking about boundless global liquidity supporting risk assets, driving risk premiums to virtually nothing, and now everybody is talking about a global liquidity crunch, driving risk premiums half the distance to the moon. Tell me, Mac, where did all the liquidity go?”
The willingness of savers to lend money and investors to underwrite risk were brought to light last month at Northern Rock where a 19th century style "run on the bank" caused millions of Britons scratch their heads.
My short answer is that liquidity is not a pool of money but rather a state of mind.
...
At the macro (systemic) level, liquidity is not about how many pieces of paper with pictures of dead presidents on them we have in our wallets, but rather about how much utility we derive from having them in our wallets. Or, as the cliché went in my youth in rural Virginia, liquidity is about whether the dead presidents are burning a hole in our wallets, or our pockets, as it were.
In today’s loosely regulated, globally integrated banking and capital markets, liquidity is about borrowers’ and lenders’ collective appetite for risk, a function of:
The willingness of investors to underwrite risk and uncertainty with borrowed money and the willingness of savers to lend money to investors who want to underwrite risk and uncertainty with borrowed money.
The nation's chief regulator, FSA chairman Callum McCarthy, commented on the liquidity crisis - the rapid deteriation of the state of confidence and the state of credit.Mr. McCarthy echoed previous comments by Mr. King that it would have been better for the central bank to provide financing covertly to prevent a crisis of confidence, though this became irrelevant after news of the bank's emergency financing became public.
Even with more covert financing in situations such as this to bolster confidence in the future, it is likely that there are more round-trip Minsky journeys ahead of us.
Northern Rock was forced to approach the Bank of England for an emergency loan facility Sept. 19 after the collapse of credit markets left it struggling to finance its operations. Mr. Sants said that facility may not have been needed if the announcement hadn't sparked the first run on a U.K. bank in more than 140 years. The bank run was only halted after the government stepped in to guarantee deposits.
7 comments:
Love the mustache on that guy. So hes the one who said you could spend your way out of every downturn?
Nice doublespeak. Liquidity = appetite for risk? I don't think so! I'm plenty liquid but I'm not going to give con-stars and morons access to it.
Tim, I think you need to explain these things better. You've got me completely lost on this one. But that won't stop me from coming back for more. I feel like guy on the Holiday Inn commercial- no, i'm not an economist but I read Tim's blog yesterday! Seriously, what the heck are you talking about?
Charles,
We can't all pull our money out of the bank at the same time, or the whole thing falss apart.
That's what liquidity means. What we think are liquid assets, cash in the bank, really aren't, since the bank is busy loaning that money out to other people. If we all want it back at once, it's a problem....
But we have to have some confidence that when we do want the money, it will be there, or we won't play the game.
Well put Donna. Charles, I hope that helps.
Actually, most people do not understand when they make a bank deposit the money becomes bank property. The laws are written to protect them. The bank is not holding your property for you. Rather, you have become a stakeholder in their enterprise. For the interest to be paid, you are assuming their risks. It's not a money warehouse. It's an outright fraud and bank runs are a perfectly normal result ... until they found a way to get some bank run insurance. Guess who backs the bank against runs? You do via the currency and the Federal Reserve. BTW, note that FDIC is also a fraud as a systemic failure (what you really the insurance for) is effectively an uninsurable event. That's nice!
The public had no idea that Northern Rock was in any difficulty until the Bank of England announced that no-one should worry, it would lend heaps to the Rock. People have become so used to being told bare-faced lies by every arm of government (thank you, Mr Blair) that next day the branches were flooded with customers and the website crashed. After lots of floundering, the status quo seems to be that the government guarantees all deposits at Northern Rock, old or new, without limit of size. Happily for you folks, you can rely on the word of your President and Congress.
Post a Comment