Why the Housing Bubble is Bad
Thursday, July 28, 2005
The housing bubble is bad for many reasons. According to the recently released Housing Bubble Fact Sheet (pdf) from the Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), probably the worst reason is:
The collapse of the housing bubble will throw the economy into a recession, and quite likely a severe recession.Another reason that the housing bubble is bad, one that you don't often hear about, is that it has given an entire generation of young adults a wholly distorted view of how the world works, and as a result, they are largely unprepared for adversity.
These young adults, roughly between the ages of 20 and 40, have known little other than prosperity in their lives. Having come of age during the early eighties or later, they have lived their entire adult lives with no major wars and no major economic crises.
They have become conditioned to accept debt as a necessary and beneficial part of their lives and many appear to be fearless in the amount of risk they take on in pursuit of making easy money.
Depending on their age, they have witnessed the Reagan Revolution, the fall of the Soviet Empire, a small housing boom, then a small war and a small recession. This was followed by the greatest stock market boom in history, which was then followed by a much smaller recession, terrorist attacks, another war, and then the greatest housing boom in history.
It is as if every time something bad happens, somehow, things not only work themselves out, but they end up better than ever before. How is this possible?
It is as if we have discovered some sort of perpetual prosperity machine.
Well, fiat money, fractional reserve banking, and deficit spending can appear to be a perpetual prosperity machine, but history shows that a system such as this would be better described as a debt bomb.
The Older Generations Know
Much of the growing volume of editorials and letters to the editor from older generations express concern for where the most recent boom - today's housing boom - has taken us. There is a growing sense among the older crowd that things just aren't right - too much debt, too many lost manufacturing jobs, too many Wal-Marts, too many SUVs, and prices that are too high for necessities such as energy and health care.
At the same time many of the twenty and thirty-somethings in the world are buying and selling investment property or figuring out some other way to spend their home equity, many with the mistaken belief that nothing bad will happen. And, if it does, someone will come in and fix it for them.
After all, everyone else is doing it!
Having missed out on the stock market bubble a few years back, many in the younger crowd are able to participate in the housing boom and have huge profits to show for their efforts. Instead of quitting college to start a software company, today some quit college to flip condos. Many are probably trying to figure out where the next bubble will be so they can get in sooner next time.
Why waste time in school studying law or medicine when all you have to do is catch the next wave?
The older generation knows that life does not normally work this way, but today's young adults, in the midst of what some have called the greatest financial bubble in history, have no frame of reference. Maybe they've read about the Great Depression, or the World Wars, or Vietnam, or the 70s recession and stagflation, but they have no first hand experience with adversity.
Many young people have become conditioned to believe that somehow they are special in this world. While this belief may have been shaken just a few years back with the stock market crash and terrorist attacks, these events didn't affect most people directly in a big way, and the recent housing boom has served to reinforce the idea that things will get fixed, and then turn out better than before.
In large part due to recent monetary policy, lending standards, and fiscal policy, many of today's young adults have come to believe that their experience in the world is typical, when in fact it is quite atypical. And, one of the most atypical aspects of the world today is the housing bubble.
10 comments:
"older generations express concern for where the most recent boom - today's housing boom - has taken us"
Ironically, it's the older generation who has led us there with easy money policies and deficit spending.
Yeah, while the vast majority of the older generation shakes their head at all of this, the select few in power are the ones that enable it. What are they thinking?
I don't get this editorial at all.
I am 48 years old, and I think the same things could be (and have been) said about everyone born since about 1946.
For example, although the Vietnam war and the 1960's were a time of crisis, things did eventually work out. Even though the 1970's inflation and early 1980's recession were bad, they caused nowhere near the devastation of the Great Depression.
I don't know who you mean by "older generation," but my sense is that the pre-baby boom "older generation" is cashing out and profiting mightily from the willingness of the "younger generation" to overpay for financial and investment assets. I am not saying that is wrong -- after all they did have to deal with the depression and fight World War II and Korea, sacrifices that made the subsequent prosperity, however artificial and debt-induced it has become, possible. They, of all people, should enjoy the benefits of that prosperity.
(By contrast, what has the baby boom generation done? Nothing, except consume the fruits of the sacrifices made by earlier generations. To *flip* Winston Churchill on his head: "Never in the history of human kind has so little been asked of so many.")
Your comment about "too much debt, too many lost manufacturing jobs, too many Wal-Marts, too many SUVs, and prices that are too high for necessities such as energy and health care" sounds a lot like the dialogue from a Michael Moore movie, effective propaganda, but not especially unbiased or accurate. And there are no facts, statistics, or even examples, to back it up.
This article contains a lot of other unsubstantiated claims I won't go into. Suffice it to say that, in terms of the overall level of economic well being, I think the current experience is entirely typical of the post-World War II era, notwithstanding the fact that investment assets, and housing in particular, are now massively overpriced in a way they were not in the past.
I like this blog a lot because it generally provides a point of view on the fed, the economy, and the housing bubble that you don't get from the mainstream media, together with the facts and statistics to back it up. Today's missive does not meet the standard, in my view.
Writing a good blog is hard work. Maybe you have temporarily run out of worthwhile things to talk about, so you came up with this.
I think Tim's point was that twenty-plus years without any broad-based and lasting financial hardship has an effect on the overall market's willingness to take risks.
Seems to me he's saying that the level of risk aversion in America has fallen far below historical averages, leading to overpayment for assets that will eventually come back to haunt the buyer.
He may be right, he may be wrong. But it seems like a decent topic to raise.
>>Seems to me he's saying that the level of risk aversion in America has fallen far below historical averages, leading to overpayment for assets that will eventually come back to haunt the buyer.
This is a valid point with which I agree. But, as I read it, Tim's piece was making some much broader claims about how the latest generation (gen X? gen Y? or who?) has it particularly easy, and that, as a result, they are particularly prone to speculation.
My point is that the current times are economically no better or worse than those in the relatively recent past (post WWII era), and, while the prices of houses and other investment assets are high (due in large part to demand from the baby boom generation), the current level of speculation is nothing unique.
Regarding the thought that the same comments could have been made anytime since 1946. The finance industry was in its infancy, with a great deal of room for growth. House purchases required large down payments, and had stringent income qualifications based upon only one wage-earner (that was ok as most households had only one person working). Vehicles were rarely financed. There was a lot of room to create consumption (aka "prosperity") through easing of lending criteria. Now we have two or more wage-earners in most families, LTV's of 105% and more, 8 year car loans or no-equity leases. It appears to me that our ability to create "prosperity" through adding debt is about at an end, leaving us with only our increases in production. That is a concern. Much of our manufacturing has been outsourced and offshored, meanwhile, the supremacy of our financial industry has lured a disproportionate number of our best and brightest youth into finance careers and away from things like engineering. I think that things are about as different from 1946 as winter is from summer.
Looks like you all have this pretty well covered. About all I have to add is that this essay was to some extent based on this post from last month and this chart from the Hodges website.
I tend to avoid the numbers and statistics when doing the occasional commentary on big picture, societal, behavioral issues such as the one today. This is not one of my better written pieces, as I've been a bit distracted this week, but I believe the fundamental argument has some merit, although it is very difficult to quantify.
Cheers!
Indeed a whole generation and one-half haven't seen 10-15% inflation, 10 % unemployment and 15+ percent car loans. I do remember my parents lamenting that us kids didn't see the Great Depression and that we should consider ourselves lucky for that. Unfortunately it was the transiate nature of their Depression Era experience that took them to early
(malnutrition).The current house run up is particulary hideous since the Gen X & Yer's must earn a ton of money just to keep up. Add to this all the National debt and inability to do something with Social Security/ Private Retirement makes me wonder if we as a nation has reach a nadir in our ability to insure that each generation does better than the one before. I have no kids so this isn't personal lament but I know people that do.
Here is what John Mauldin says about deflation in his book, Bullseye Investring (which is a very good book, BTW):
"Deflation is a broad-based decline in general prices over time that results from a decrease in the quantity of money in relation to the available goods. It generally is known to occur when there is a general money supply contraction. Deflation can occur following a period of excess supply or capacity beyond demand with a pervasive psychology of delayed spending or due to economy-wide debt reduction (or debt destruction).
I'm 48 too, but I remember selling homes in sluggish or declining markets 3 times, and it wasn't pleasant. I can't understand the current feeling that real estate can only go up, because of my past experience. I think that the point about only remembering prosperity is valid.
Post a Comment