Wikinvest Wire

Save the Dollar or Save Housing - Pick One

Thursday, April 20, 2006

This week's performance of the U.S. Dollar against the rest of the world's paper money has not been very impressive. The performance against the world's oldest money has been downright scary. More and more, it is looking like new Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke will have precious little time to settle into the big chair at the head of the table before being faced with some tough decisions.

Despite the noise coming from most of the mainstream financial media and from nearly all of government, heralding the robust economic expansion that has reached far and wide in a land of endless bounty, the reality is far from the non-inflationary growth nirvana that those wearing rose-colored glasses describe.

The reality of rising interest rates amidst a faltering housing market has pitted two opposing forces squarely against each other and will result in some agonizing decisions for the new Fed Chairman, who, eleven weeks into his term must regret having accepted this position by now - either that, or he is hopelessly out of touch.

Force Number One

Opposing force number one is the American consumer and his debt. Dependent upon the easy money provided by liberal extraction of home equity gains over recent years, the terms of said extraction are now working in a manner that few could have imagined when they made their bargain to immediately and dramatically improve their standard of living back when cocktail party chatter was dominated by real estate.

The good times have come to an end thanks to former Fed Chairman Alan "Babysteps" Greenspan, who after checking out in January to begin a lucrative speaking tour and work on his memoirs, leaves behind the biggest bubble of them all after having poked at it with a dull pin for much of the last two years. With rising interest rates that are starting to bite and with flat or falling housing prices over the last nine months that are starting to be noticed, the whole idea of living beyond one's means holds little of the appeal that it did a year or two ago.

With the reality of debt service, high fuel bills, and lackluster wage growth staring them down, the American consumer is now starting to blink. As documented in an ever increasing number of news segments about faltering real estate markets and too much debt to accompany too little savings, American consumers have gotten their post-Greenspan wake-up call and they are grumpily stirring, set to begin a new day.

Rising interest rates are not compatible with life as we now know it in America.

Force Number Two

Opposing force number two is the rest of the world and their perception of the U.S. dollar. For many years now the rest of the world has happily gone along with the idea that the greenback was not backed by anything other than faith in the U.S. government to do the right thing and confidence that the American economy would continue to thrive. This has worked out rather well for all involved parties.

Since the implosion of the Japanese economy and the fall of the Soviet Union, that faith has not been questioned in a big way, but it is being questioned now. Many of our trading partners around the world are beginning to suspect that their worst fears may indeed be true - that the robust American economy and the resilient American consumer, the locomotives for global growth since the stock market crash of five years ago, may not be what they appear to be.

Around the rest of the world, the U.S. dollar is losing its luster. The rate raising cycle that began almost two years ago has had the effect of distracting attention from the intractable problems facing the American economy - the twin deficits, long term commitments the government can't keep, and stagnant wages among others. Rising interest rates in the U.S. have restored respectability to the world's reserve currency after rates were held at historically low levels for what seemed like an interminable period of time, but with the recent chatter about the rate raising cycle coming to an end, everything is about to change.

Rising interest rates have been the only thing keeping the U.S. dollar aloft in recent years.

Ben's Choice

So the choice for Ben Bernanke is quite simple - save the dollar or save housing. Pick one, because you can't do both.

Saving the dollar would require continuing to raise interest rates not just to five percent but to six, seven, or even higher. Real interest rates, based on a more sensible gauge of "inflation", must be returned to historical norms to cool rising prices that show up everywhere except for government statistics. The long deferred pain must be delivered to the American consumer who spends too much, saves too little, and borrows much too much.

Continuing to raise interest rates would allow the U.S. Dollar to maintain its place as the world's reserve currency, proving to our trading partners that the dollars and dollar-denominated debt they are accumulating will maintain a good portion of their value over time.

Continuing to raise interest rates will, unfortunately, also kill housing and the economy.

Saving housing would require ceasing the interest rate hike campaign and likely reversing course. The pain already delivered must be dialed back, and what is waiting in the pipeline must somehow be stopped short of delivery. America's love affair with real estate, exotic loans, and adjustable rate mortgages will be forever shattered if the $1.2 trillion of ARMs are allowed to adjust to their prescribed levels next March. We Americans have become soft in recent years and can't take such a punch to the belly.

Easing off on interest rates would allow the housing market to achieve a soft landing where no one gets hurt. Spending will slow down, construction will slow down, and people will find something else to talk about at cocktail parties.

Easing off on interest rates will save the world - for a while.

Ben's choice is clear - the dollar is going down.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

But, if he cuts rates foreigners may bail on long term debt. Housing done either way?

Metroplexual said...

Yup! Housing is toast but could both happen? My savings should probably be converted to gold

Anonymous said...

Sell real estate and buy gold, and maybe some extra bullets and some Budweiser.

Anonymous said...

Good analysis. There's another problem with raising rates now. That would put pressure on American debtors, and increase the risk of default on mortgage-backed securities, Fannie Mae bonds, etc. Lots of these are held by the usual suspects: foreign governments, central banks, etc. Net result: the dollar's value gets defended, however all this dollar-denominated debt doesn't get paid back!

Either way, our creditors are well and truly scr*wed. They either get paid back in worthless paper, or they don't get their principal back.

agezna said...

"Continuing to raise interest rates will, unfortunately, also kill housing and the economy."

I don't agree with that "kill the economy" bit. I would agree with you if you mean "risk putting the economy in recession." "Kill" sounds to me like you mean depression.

A housing correction is not going to put the US economy into depression.

Now, a housing correction followed by government intervention could cause a depression. For example, exporting all the illegal aliens, increased implementation of economic protectionism, increasing taxes and regulation, and some kind of terrorist attack that compels Uncle Sam to take away even more liberty... all those things can risk a depression, and therefore risk a political climate similar to Germany in the early 1930s. That doesn't imply the U.S.A takes the same path, but every year we continue the course we are on, the probability (though currently low) of that scenario coming true increases.

I am confident we will not let this happen. But that doesn't mean I condone the Patriot Act.

Anonymous said...

An interesting take on fed policy by Bill Fleckenstein. Apparently they are asleep at the switch.

http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/P148501.asp

m reynolds

Anonymous said...

There is no way to save the dollar or the US economy.

At least, not for long.

The reason is that even if Bernanke makes the tough choice to dramatically raise interest rates (and crush the housing market), this will simply create the new problem of having a crushing burden of interest on the debt.

Once interest rates are jacked up, there will be no domestic economy left as an engine of growth. In other words, bye-bye tax revenues.

So government will continue to run a massive deficit when it needs the tax revenues the most. It will instead be forced to inflate the currency in order to pay off the debt, a process which will be none too appealing to foreign debtors.

A side effect will be that wealth will be transferred massively out of the country, from the domestic population to foreigners.

No, I think what Bernanke is going to do is try to (hyper)inflate domestically, without driving as much of the wealth out of the country. I don't know exactly how he is going to spend all of the extra M3, but the Fed seems poised to take it out of the hands of the banking system.

Anonymous said...

The dollar is going down because there is no political will to make the necessary changes. But, like a cornered animal, it can still hurt you if you are not careful.

Now, so all will know how much of a wacko I am, please help blow holes in my pet theory: the BOC will try to remonetize silver.

Fact: Despite what they will admit publicly, any sane central banker knows that there will be a USD currency crisis and therefore a WW remonetization of gold.

Fact: The last time China was on a hard currency standard, theirs was silver while all other major powers used gold. Interestingly enough, most of this silver was acquired during the massive trade surplus they enjoyed with Europe during the 18th and 19th centuries. Sound familiar?

Likely conjecture: While the rest of the major world powers still hold large gold reserves but no silver reserves, China has large silver reserves and small gold reserves.

Fact: In terms of a purely monetary function, gold and silver are interchangeable. The relative value of one over another is purely a matter of custom.

Pet Theory: Now, what would you do if you were the BOC? You are accumulating large quantities of USD reserves. You know that a USD crisis will eventually transpire. You control large reserve quantities of silver. Everyone else controls large quantities of gold. Conclusion, in response to a major currency crisis, the world's most dynamic large economy will surely back the remonetization of silver. Silver will significantly outperform gold.

Anonymous said...

Save Housing? What kind of a leading question is that? Do you mean, save the profits of our no-money-down gamblers who put our economy at great risk or do you mean save our GSEs so we don't have to bail them out?

Anonymous said...

you are WRONG! bernanke cannot ditch dollar...if dollar tanks, US supremacy is over..people will flee...immigrants will go back..std of living would drop considerably, since dollar would worthless again foreign goods..and if dollar tanks, your house denominated in dollar tanks anyway..

So there is no alternative..housing/commodities/gold/oil/emrging market all will tank...deflation my friend is the only alternative.

Anonymous said...

Anon 740pm,

Good luck to you. People around here can't even bear the idea of a mild recession. Recall what happened when Bush tried to reform Social Security. Where is there any evidence that public spending will be curtailed? We are past the point of no return. Deflation will be the final outcome, just not deflation in terms of USD.

Anonymous said...

If BB let the U.S. dollar fall by 30%, would the price of imported oil go up by 30%?

TJandTheBear said...

The destination is not in question -- all roads lead to depression. Only the route and speed are in question.

Metroplexual said...

If deflation hits, would cpi be negative and thus SS payments would be reduced?

Anonymous said...

Deflation is here but in hard currency terms, NOT USD. How much real stuff could you buy with an oz of silver or gold in 2001? How much can you buy now? This will continue until all the major malinvestments are liquidated and major imbalances resolved.

Anonymous said...

21 April 06

More Than Ever... Expect The,,,, Very Unexpected ....
The Unbalanced Global Macroeconomy ...... And The US Long Term Debt Market.

The Wilshire bested the 7 April 2006 key reversal day with an hour's
worth of frenetic activity - only to end in a caricatured double top
below the 7 April high.

The Wilshire's most recent daily fractal progression from October 2005
is:

24/60/48 of 48 or X/2.5X/2X. The nonlinear break near the end of the
second fractal of this progression is seen best on the NASDAQ 100:
NDX.

GM, propelled by the recent interest in gas efficient SUV's and modest
oil and gas prices has made a surge within the confines of a:

5/13/33/ - 34 fractal which when integrating 5/13/33 into the first
two fractals becomes a 14/35/ 34 of 28-35 maximum progression.
GM's financial position has been improved only transiently by the
value of its stock, which is providing low element blow-off for both
the DOW and the Wilshire.

Gold stocks and gold have received a nice influx of eastern and
speculative western money that has propelled metal values to about
30 percent of their 1982 dollar values. The best fractal count for gold
stocks and gold are from a near term bottom:

10/20 of 25/25. X /2x of 2.5X with a breakdown at 2x or day 20


Fractal progression of equity, bond, commodity and asset valuations
and the global macroeconomy,.... the global macroeconomy and fractal
progression of equity, bond, commodity and asset valuations.... are
intertwined; are one in the same. The mechanistic daily valuation
fractals represent the precise barometric quantification, the
integrated summation zero's to nine's numbers of actual money
investment distributed in the complex money-debt-asset system.

Today the world currency is the US dollar. The US uses this Superpower
backed valuable commodity to import about 13 million barrels of oil a
day. At 10 dollars a barrel that's 130 million dollars a day. At 70
dollars its closer to a billion a day. For the last year the US has
traded over 250 billion of its IOU dollar currency in exchange for
foreign oil. A good piece of the US foreign trade deficit arises
precisely from that indispensable and essential commodity.

Other energy poor countries, our 'trading partners', who own over 2
trillion of US debt instruments, convertible at present with little
difficulty into dollars, likewise use the utility of the US dollar to
finance their own more modest energy needs.

Something has happened to the actual IOU dollar- somewhat convertible
long term US debt interface. The US long bond and ten year note since
March 2006 have begun a critical inexorable at-a-minimum short term
and perhaps longer term fractal climb correlative to rising long term
interest rates that is on a head-on freight train collision course
with equity and commodity asset valuations. The three investment
locomotives: equities, commodities, and bonds are 120 degrees apart;
travelling at 200 miles an hour; and are arriving at the same point in
the wheel house simultaneously. The coming twisted metal of these
colliding forces aligns with the non complex and curious complex
fractal solution of the last posting and reiterated again below.

The possibility of a 20 March 2006 Iranian transitional change from the dollar to the
Euro for oil has been fingered as the triggering event for the US
bond's recent activity. Indeed the long term US debt instruments'
close call inversion with the shorter US T Bill was arrested on 22 March 2006, 2
days later. With the recent highly publicized inflammatory rhetoric of
the Iranian president and the earlier economic Armageddon predictions
of the famous 911 Saudi renegade, a case could be made for an Iranian
precipitated global economic weapon of mass destruction in its
conversion from US dollars to Euros for oil trade. The case could be
made - but it would be false.

The Iranian conversion to the Euro would have been a serendipitous true, true, and
unrelated occurrence, small, even minute, in comparison to the
gathering storm building into a global economic hurricane. US recent
bond activity is a result of terminal unsustainable and tipping point
imbalances in the global macroeconomy. All informed sources understand
that paper will not forever be traded across sovereign borders for
useful items and services. There is a point where a transition must
and does occur. It has never been a question of if, but rather when.
It is the fractal evolution of investment items that delineate when.

For the US this transition point is not being caused by Iran, whose
country produces only 5 per cent of the world's oil. Its radical
Islamic regime's threatened change to denominate oil in Euro's is not the
trigger; rather this transition point is a result of the full
saturation of the overly-consumed American consumer who has been painted
into the very small domestic service wages parts of a vanishing corner, having been
earlier enticed to incur debt at excessively low interest rates with
reckless and predatory lending practices. That American consumer, the
primary engine of recent global economic expansion, is faced with the
reality that has been directly caused by excess borrowing and money
creation - inflation of raw commodities and the predictable Fed response
of raising interest rates.

The American consumer is a member of the interconnected global economy
and is indirectly and directly competing with the Asian service and
manufacturing worker. Further loss of American manufacturing jobs will occur.
Unbalanced US wages relative to those foreign workers must and
inexorably will reequilibrate. US wage earners with their two cars,
extra investment house, and high debt load have been, are, and will
be, unlikely buyers of US debt instruments.

Foreign owners of US debt instruments are now choosing between
ownership of dollars or debt instruments. While both are backed by a
military and an arms legacy of an earlier American tradition,
ingenuity, and engineering value system, both are poor long term
investments in a country sans manufacturing, tradable international
services, huge unpayable entitlement programs in a reequilibrating
rebalancing global macroeconomy.

From 22 March 2006 the rising fractal evolution of long term interest
rates, TNX annd TYX are:

First fractal: 5/13/7 days = 23 days

Second fractal 9/11 of 21-23/18-23 days = 46-47 plus days.

How high will the long term US debt instrument rise in the next 27-32
trading days? This time progression matches a weekly precious metals
devolution of 12/25 of 30 X /2.5x and a daily equity devolution of
X/2.5x/2x and 1.5x or 24/60/48 and 35 days.

Expect the very unexpected.

Gary Lammert

Anonymous said...

Let's see:

1) The Fed has increased rates, 1/4 pts at at time, 15X in a row.

2) The Fed will probably raise rates by another 1/4 pt on May 10.

3) If Fed raises, it will be the 16th rate increase

4) 5% is not a bad rate. Only Australia and New Zealand pay higher rates.

So what has the Fed been doing the past two years -- Raising rates.
Seems to me the Fed is worried about inflation and speculation in real estate and other asset bubbles. The Fed knows they can only go so far before the economy tanks. 5% is still not that high. My guess is we'll go to over 6% within the next 18 months before the Fed can stop.

Results?
A) Real estate will tank

B) Dollar will hang in there because of higher rates.

C) Stock market will tank because of higher rates

D) Commodities may continue to soar due to demand from China.

E) The world does not end.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP