Wikinvest Wire

Is it Getting Weimar in Here?

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

You can't help but look around these days and think that things are changing rapidly for the U.S. Dollar. Of course you have to know where to look and what to look for - most people don't have the foggiest idea on either count.

But now most people do know that last year's $3 plus gas prices were not just a hurricane induced aberation. Most people now realize that gas prices have risen dramatically and they are reminded of that fact once every week or so.

Though a mild winter did leave the impression that the global energy picture has not yet reached crisis stage, the increasing talk of $4 or $5 gasoline and $100 oil when combined with their personal experience at the pump has to be making people think a little bit about the value of the dollar.

The buzz of activity from elected officials undoubtedly soothes some nerves, but all the rising prices taken together - energy, housing, health care, transportation, tuition, and others - are beginning to have an effect that is contrary to the intent of the designers of the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation report.

The inflation reporting methodology may need to be reworked once again because recently, inflation again appears to be overstated, or more accurately, the number being reported is higher than those in power would like it to be.

This seems to be the real inflation fighting work done by a government that has little choice other than to debase their currency in an attempt to forestall as long as possible the inevitable conclusion of this latest experiment with fiat money.

Unrestricted creation of money and credit, the real "mother's milk" of economic growth, always ends badly.

That was the point of the gold standard, however flawed that it was - to restrict the creation of money. Let money creation loose from the shackles of gold backing and combine with fractional reserve banking and Wall Street financial products, and there are virtually no limits to the amount of money and credit that can be created.

But, the funny thing about fiat money is that up until the point that the wheels are about to fall off, everything seems to be going along swimmingly.

Look at stock markets these days - the Dow Jones Industrial Average is getting ready to poke through the 2000 high and many foreign stock exchanges are setting new highs daily.

Is this what it felt like in the early days of the Weimar Inflation?

Before things really got out of hand?

Alarm Bells

Gold and silver should be setting off alarm bells around the world, as their rise since the hurricanes struck the Gulf Coast last year has been no less than meteoric. And there are no signs yet of any slow down.

Since last summer, gold has risen by 60 percent and silver over 100 percent.

Many old-timers have taken note of this development, but much of the rest of the world, including nearly all economists and financial news TV pundits, view this condition as a sort of freak occurrence - something completely and totally irrelevant to today's economy. An oddity.

The demand for commodities can be explained by robust global growth, but the flight away from fiat money is not something that is covered in the curriculum for economics majors these days.

Economists boldly assert that they, and not the market forces that determine relative value, are in control. Gold and silver are simply in a speculative bubble, an unnecessary inflation hedge, or an unneeded safe harbor during rising global tensions - that's the story.

While the economic statistics show a healthy economy with robust growth and benign inflation, the reality is far from this rosy scenario, and one by one, people will begin to understand the fundamental problems of this economy as it hits them time and again in their pocket book.

Obviously, we are nowhere near the condition of the Weimar Republic, where, at the height of the inflation, postage stamps had a face value of fifty billion marks and one poor old lady was assaulted as she transported a wheelbarrow full of marks to the baker to buy a loaf of bread.

The perpetrator dumped the marks out onto the sidewalk and absconded with the wheelbarrow.

In the months and years, ahead, when economic weakness is treated with the same U.S. Dollar remedy that has worked so many times in the past and the cure is found to no longer works its magic, that's when people will begin to realize what is happening.

That time may be sooner than most people think.

When the antidote must be applied in stronger and stronger doses despite the repercussions, despite the impact that these actions have on prices, that's when things will really heat up.

Until then, it will just feel a little Weimar.

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ok, probably a dumb question but i'll ask anyway. Say that prior to a period of hyper-inflation you hold a loan, lets say a half million dollar mortgage.

Given that employers started paying twice daily in the case of Weimar. Theoretically you would be able to skip lunch for a day and pay off your mortgage, correct?

Would banks have an recourse in refusing the pay off? What am I missing here?

Anonymous said...

I've always liked this story about someone's grandfather who left Germany in 1923:

http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/2005/0728.html

My grandfather had a large box of money with him on the train. To his surprise, after buying the ticket he actually had money left over! But what should he do with the extra money? My grandfather realized that Reichmarks would be worthless in the U.S., so he decided to pack the money up in another box (“larger than a shoebox,” he said) and mail it home to his father. However at the central Post Office in Rotterdam he was disappointed to be told that the postage on mailing the box of money to Germany was as much as the box of money itself!

Worker 17 said...

Two hundred plus years of the dollar- major wars, depressions, energy spikes, inflationary spirals, stock market crashes and huge drops in the values of homes- but this time it's going to be the Weimar republic? Seems like a huge stretch, Tim.

Anonymous said...

After WWII Germany still had the DM untill the Euro. It is gettin Weimar im hier.

Anonymous said...

the other side,

I do not recollect the exact details, but the germans were printing mad money to repay debt to the French.

Our case in the US might be a little different. A lot of our debt is owned by pension plans, 401k plans, social security, and elite american wealth. These are some powerful voters. They will severely pressure the federal reserve to not allow hyper-inflation.

Anonymous said...

Well more of the John Birch, goldbug doomsdaying.

I personally think that there are serious problems, that the dollar may fall significantly, that the next recession may be called a depression, that living standards will fall.

But historically the 20th century system had far more power of readjustment and correction than the 19th. "Fiat" money can go out of control and it may have, but there are known means of correction. In the first part of the 19th century the lack of currency led to State banks releasing paper of questionable value, industry was stymied by lack of money, banks failed routinely, huge depressions struck and the "gold standard" (it really wasn';t since all sorts of other mediums acted as money) held only because of massive discoveries first in California then Alaska.

So you want us to be more dependant on Peru than we are on Opec? Did you ever hear "Don't crucify us on your cross of gold?" Do you want the farmers of the midwest to turn into socialist revolutionaries again?

Tim said...

Folks - don't get too carried away with this, I've been wanting to use this title for a long time now, and this is what came out.

I don't think we'll ever go back to something like the gold standard (although you never know), but between now and whatever replaces the current monetary system, gold will rise in price and we will get lots more inflation (whether it shows up in the CPI is another matter).

Anon 8:31 - that's why governments would much prefer inflation to deflation - it makes debt much easier to pay off.

Anonymous said...

Ignorant Investor:

You've been had.

The dollar you use today is not the dollar that existed 200 years ago.

Its not even the dollar that existed 100 years ago.

Its not the dollar that existed 50 years ago.

Or even 30 years ago.

Or, arguably, even 10 years ago.

You see, in each of these time periods, starting about 100 years ago with the creation of the Fed, the dollar was somehow irrevocably redefined in a way that made it fundamentally different, and usually, much worse.

In the last redefinition, the banking industry was finally freed from the last vestige of any reserve fraction requirement, allowing basically unlimited creation of money, directly by the investment and retail banks.

Before that was the more familiar abandonment of the gold standard by Nixon, when France began demanding payments in gold on dollars and dollar securities. This was an effective default.

In fact a number of these redefinitions were effectively defaults; but the US always managed to deceive or bully its own citizens or the world out of any rational recourse.

This system works as long as the US is the primary hegemonic superpower of the world, but it guarantees the end of that status through its own excesses.

The rest of the world is finally realizing the tables are turned: we're completely dependent on them. All they have to do is tap us, and this junkie--addicted to oil, addicted to debt, and too intoxicated to have any sense of its own peril--falls right over.

Anonymous said...

Ha!!! You betcha it's Weimar here. And, it's going to get a whole lot Weimar yet.

Worker 17 said...

aaron:

"The dollar you use today is not the dollar that existed 200 years ago."

Well, duh. I also don't get paid a buck a week in wages like they did 200 years ago. And since every other country has addictions of their own, I guess we'll all explode our economies together and return to the barter system in a post-apocalyptic wasteland where only gold and the strong survive. But I've got a nice cave picked out already. So I'm not too worried.

Anonymous said...

have you ever asked yourself why you don't still get paid a buck a week?

Anonymous said...

You print too much money and you make bubbles. Most everyone knows that. First the Fed made a stock market bubble, which remember is hard to tell its a bubble until after it pops (ha ha). At least it isn't counted in CPI, thank God. Then they made a real estate bubble, also hard to tell until after it pops, and also not counted directly in the CPI. But now there seems to be a commodities bubble forming, and all of a sudden the raw materials for everything that is counted in the CPI is going up in price. This one will be much harder to ignore.

Anonymous said...

Tim. You've simply out-done yourself. That is the best-gal-dang title for a post I've ever seen.

Hands down. High-larious.

agezna said...

We're not going to see hyper-inflation in the US, but I'm convinced we're going to see more price inflation over the next couple of decades than we've had over the last couple.

Isn't there are a large pension shortfall? All the defined pension plans currently underfunded benefit from an inflation do they not?

What about GM, do they benefit from an inflation?

Of course, we know the government benefits.

Worker 17 said...

"have you ever asked yourself why you don't still get paid a buck a week?"

Because my labor is worth more than a buck a week to my employer. Any other questions?

Anonymous said...

chessplaying: yes and no. although many governments have historically tried to print out of debt its not always the case.

If our nation is truely capitalistic, then we won't try to do that.

Asset holders don't want the government to print money because inflation simply leads to more taxes on psuedo-gains on investments. A big ouch to investors. They rather raise income tax across the board and have the government makeup the shortfall.

Japan is a modern example of a government looking out for its long-term asset holders.

Anonymous said...

Ignorant Investor:

You might be right that its not going to be like the Weimar republic, but I would love to see you explain the mechanics of how exactly we are going to avoid hyperinflation, save a crushing deflation (as in the Great Depression).

Its worse than just no one having offered a satisfactory explanation; no one has offered any explanation at all. The closest it comes is the non-argument "things haven't exploded so far, therefore they will never explode" (nevermind that the Great Depression happened, and it was pretty bad).

I'm beginning to think Bernanke was hand-picked due to his stated intent never to repeat the Great Depression. And that means a hell of a lot of inflation---and not the "trickle-down" feel-good kind we've become accustomed to, but an insidious, "fire up the printing presses, people need wheelbarrows of greenbacks to buy bread" kind of inflation.

So, what's it going to be? How are they going to do it? I'm genuinely interested... my future depends on it as much as yours, after all.

Anonymous said...

Bernanke!

"We conclude that, under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation." (1)

Ha! Not if the we don't want to use USD as money. Who said Ben-Gay? That's right on. Runaway deflation in hard money has started and cannot be stopped. The train is leaving the station.

--
(1) http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2002/20021121/default.htm

Anonymous said...

People talk a lot about the Weimar experience in hyperinflation, but really don't understand what happened. I STILL don't fully myself, but am working on it.

To the poster who asked about the bank loan - at times in Weimar Germany, they revalued the loans so that the banks wouldn't completely implode. If you were smart or lucky enough to prepay or pay off in the beginning and owned your home, you probably did best. The problem was that due to a rent law, rents couldn't be raised (much like new york city's rent controls). So landlords were unable to pay the mortgages with the rents of the renters. Interestingly, this created some interesting speculative opportunities for foreigners.

BSB is a deflation hawk, not an inflation hawk. He was placed into that position to ensure that we did not go into a deflationary spiral, which would bankrupt the empire of debt. You can be sure that inflation, real or implied, will exist in the system for some time with rate hikes maintained to 'fight inflation'. Which by the way, will be inherently inbred into the system via an inflation target - rate hikes will always lag the true inflation rate of 3-4% (which won't be accurately reported by CPI due to hedonic accounting).

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I don't think there were many 30-year fixed-rate loans in Weimar Germany, so hyper-inflation wasn't really helping you payoff the mortgage.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP