Wikinvest Wire

Tales of the Commodity Bubble

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

With the recent rise in oil and gasoline prices, and with the peddlers of gold coins starting to compete with Ditech.com for advertising spots on CNBC, lots of people are talking about the commodity bubble. Are commodities really in a bubble?

Who would you ask? Who would know?

Warren Buffet weighed in on the subject last weekend at the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting in Omaha. Always a big fan of the world's second wealthiest man, known for his shrewd investment deals, plainspoken manner, and modest approach toward personal consumption, his message about commodities was not all that clear.

When asked about the commodity bubble, Mr. Buffet replied.

"I don't think there's a bubble in agricultural commodities like wheat, corn and soybeans. But in metals and oil there's been a terrific [price] move. It's like most trends: At the beginning, it's driven by fundamentals, then speculation takes over. As the old saying goes, what the wise man does in the beginning, fools do in the end. With any asset class that has a big move, first the fundamentals attract speculation, then the speculation becomes dominant.

"Once a price history develops, and people hear that their neighbor made a lot of money on something, that impulse takes over, and we're seeing that in commodities and housing...Orgies tend to be wildest toward the end. It's like being Cinderella at the ball. You know that at midnight everything's going to turn back to pumpkins & mice. But you look around and say, 'one more dance,' and so does everyone else. The party does get to be more fun -- and besides, there are no clocks on the wall. And then suddenly the clock strikes 12, and everything turns back to pumpkins and mice."
If you read this a couple times, you come away with the impression that he really didn't want to answer what was probably the direct question, "Is there a commodity bubble?"

First, it's a 'no' for agriculture, then a "terrific price move" for metals, followed by a discussion of the general characteristics of bubbles, ending up with a mixing of commodities and housing in the same sentence that also included more general discussion of bubbles.

One thing is sure, none of my neighbors are talking about all the money they're making in precious metals. We are probably years away from cocktail party chatter about junior mining companies. As an anonymous commenter remarked on yesterday's post:
I'm in a mining-centric city (Vancouver - many mining Co. Head Offices here) and still waiting to hear the first peep from a co-worker, relative or anyone else in a social setting about commodities (outside of whining about gas prices).

Not even on the radar.
We're still years away from commodities being in a Mom and Pop style bubble - with broad public participation. Maybe it's a little bubble-like for pension and hedge fund managers, but the party doesn't really begin until the really dumb money shows up.

Out of respect for Mr. Buffet, the obvious segue from the last paragraph will be resisted, and it will simply be noted that, according to this report, Berkshire Hathaway's 130 million ounce stash of silver, purchased in 1998, is gone.
At the company’s shareholder meeting in Omaha, Nebraska on Saturday, Chairman Warren Buffett announced that the company has divested its silver holdings.
...
The source said Buffett didn't really talk about silver other than he sold it, but said he would rather hold businesses that have earnings.
...
Buffett said that Berkshire had not benefited from the particularly steep rise in silver prices.

“I bought it very early, I sold it very early. Other than that it was perfect,” he joked.
The Sage of Omaha is still thought of very highly here - he's just having a hard time adapting to this "bubble economy" of the last ten years.

Turn on the TV

Over at CNBC, you get a distinctly different take on commodities depending on who's talking. Watching Kudlow & Company on CNBC, an occasional vice easily rationalized by the regular Thursday appearance of uber-blogger Barry Ritholtz, leads to the conclusion that there is a new leading indicator for the commodities bull market - Larry Kudlow.

When Larry says it's not a bubble - that's your cue to sell.
On last Thursday's show, Larry asks Herb Greenberg the obvious question.
Kudlow: I remember the internet bubble - this commodity thing reminds me of the internet bubble ... how does this feel to you? Has this got an internet bubble feel to it?

Greenberg: Well, it's more like it has the housing bubble feel to me, at least how it felt three years ago when I thought it was a bubble and so I'm afraid to say the same thing about this. I spent a good part of the day talking to a lot of people who are somehow involved in the commodities market, either in the pits or people who follow commodities for their hedge funds, and I seem to come away with nobody really feeling strongly that there's a bubble.

It's very interesting. They're not feeling that way in the pits, they're not feeling that way in the markets, because you see such demand Larry. There's clearly demand there, but, the caveat is there's clearly so much speculation now going into that - it's a great tug of war about what the dynamics of that market really are.
Later in the show, Ron Insana was asked about the commodity bubble. Somebody, please just say it's a bubble and make Larry happy.
Insana: There's a lot of reasons why commodities could be going up. Some are very good. The world economy is growing very rapidly, China 10.2 percent, India 7.4 percent, the U.S. almost 5 percent, so the demand for stuff, as Jim Grant likes to call it, is very, very strong and prices are going up.
...
The worry here is not that this is inidicative of strong economic growth, but that it is indicative of inflationary pressures that may be building in the worldwide economy, or that speculators have taken such large positions in commodities because there is so much money sloshing around the globe that we're ripe for a rather large pull-back.

I read one statistic today that suggested that hedge funds are controlling one billion barrels of oil - a lot of these charts have gone parabolic. Some hedge funds want to short the stuff, but every time they try, they get killed.

Kudlow: How about these new ETFs Ron? They're all piling in like a momentum play which means they're going to get their heads chopped off.

Insana: Investors or traders who have missed this rally, which by the way has been going on since 1998, they're piling in, maybe at the end, although some business people I talked to think this is a secular trend in commodity prices that may suffer an intermediate term correction.
Somebody call it a bubble! Right now! Barry Ritholtz!
Kudlow: Barry Ritholtz, are you ready to be a good contrarian, and step up to the plate and tell people to get out before their head gets chopped off?

Ritholtz: No. I'm going to tell you that historically, these commodity booms tend to last years and years, not five or six years, but ten or fifteen years - we're probably about half-way through this.
No luck this time. Maybe after a correction is underway it will be easier to get someone, anyone, to confirm the existence of this dangerous, yet very popular asset class that seems intent on chopping heads off.

A Reader Writes

Shortly thereafter, mail was received from reader Eric who was complaining about CNBC and their selective use of the word bubble.
The very same cable program that banned Bill Fleckenstein off their future programs, because he called them "bubbleheads". The same cable program that was forbidden to use the term "bubble" when the internet stocks went crashing...
It was at that time that something popped into my head - something about CNBC and the word bubble.

What was it?

Tivo was summoned to again replay these commodity segments from the CNBC show - something had worked its way into America's collective consciousness (including mine) and was being brought back to the surface by Eric's mail.

There it was.

A quick review of the commodity discussion revealed that the words COMMODITY BUBBLE had been conveniently displayed at the bottom of the screen during much of the discussion where Larry was begging for someone to call it just that.

Not "COMMODITY BUBBLE?" - with a question mark.

But, as a statement of fact - "COMMODITY BUBBLE".

Some more mail was exchanged with Eric, and we both had a couple of laughs at the thought of CNBC displaying INTERNET BUBBLE in big bold letters at the bottom of the screen a few years back when Mr. Fleckenstein was having such trouble getting on the air.

Keep an eye on Larry Kudlow - when he caves in - sell your gold.

23 comments:

Tim said...

Blogger has been having some serious downtime problems lately - almost three hours this morning, with a similar incident last week. At some point this blog will be moving - maybe sooner than I had been planning, if this keeps up.

Anonymous said...

"Bull markets climb a wall of worry."

Commodities right now are climbing that wall. Every step up is accompanied by pundits yelling "Bubble! Sell!! It's going down!" And after every little correction they yell "See! I told you!"

Things only become bubbles with the speculative frenzy where masses of people believe it will never go back down again, when people are taking out loans to buy it. I knew we were in deep trouble in real estate a year or two ago when a purchasing clerk at my workplace was talking about the 4 rentals she owned.

Still, no one is talking about gold. When I would declare it a bubble is when the lines come back to the coin dealers (like they were in the 70's) and people are talking at work about whether American Eagles or Maple Leaves (Leafs?) are preferable.

I go to coin shows, and they're still ghost towns. Actually, attendance is slightly up from a year or two ago, but I still wouldn't call them "crowded."

- Pete

john_law_the_II said...

I should add, pension funds and whatnot are JUST starting to gain ANY non-stock exposure to commodoties. they are just putting in their initial 5% or whatever.

Anonymous said...

"commodities" is a somewhat ceceptive term. Gold and precious metals have some big differences from items related to production.

My own guess is that many commodities are in a secular bull, but may get hit by a local downturn.

Pricewise based on stocks oil and a number of others are not that badly priced by today's market standards. But it is quite possible that conservation and economic slowdown could hurt price.

A lot of gold stocks are out of this world. GG not a really great stock but one which attracts the masses has doubled since I bought it based on tips. I'm ready to sell at any time. Gold would have to go up a lot to make it worth it's price and while I intuitively expect a long term resetting of gold price between 800 and a 1200, assuming a relatively ok world economy, it could be years to get there. And p/e of gold stocks does usually depend on copper price along with energy. If cooper goes down and a housing crunch in the US would sla demand mining costs per oz of gold go up.

I personally think people are playing with something quite volatile and in terms of heavy metals the market is so small it doesn't take tips from taxi drivers to show serious distortion.

So be careful. The fact that a lot of people aren't is a warning. As is the plying of hedge funds.

Anonymous said...

Interesting theory why Buffet didn't make money on silver:

http://www.investmentrarities.com/weeklycommentary05-08-06.html

Anonymous said...

Warren was not confusing at all.

First there are the Fundamental reasons for a price move (in the case of metals the move is up). The investor's job is to understand the fundamentals.
[insert your analysis here]


When your neighbors start talking about how much money they made in metals (gold) the second phase Has Been Reached.

The mystery part for you (the enthusiastic investor) is how much of the current market is Fundamental and how much is Speculation and What is your exit point?

Sounds to me like the party is just getting good and you are in for another dance.

and that bit about their being no clock on the wall...
It means you (Tim-citizen) are not usually connected well enough to the fundamentals to know either what the fundamental drivers are or what they are doing.


Buffet has made a pile over the past 40 years by sticking (mostly) to the types of businesses he understands.
...as in "understands the fundamentals"

Anonymous said...

Anon 11:07, I couldn't agree more. Buffet didn't jump up and down waving his arms and scream "You're darned right there's a commodity bubble!" Instead he just layed out some facts about bubbles and explained why commodities is probably a bubble right now. He could not have spoken more plainly. "...in metals and oil there's been a terrific [price] move. ... With any asset class that has a big move, first the fundamentals attract speculation, then the speculation becomes dominant."

In other words, "metals and oil" have been going nuts, and speculators are taking over, so naturally, prices are out of whack. This market is a bubble.

I think years of trying to decipher Greenspan's verbiage has hindered people's language comprehension skills.

Anonymous said...

The rapid runup in commodities prices implies speculation. We didn't have a 30% increase in demand for gold or silver of palladium or copper in the last few months. So the parabolic price rise doesn't match fundamentals. If you say it does, show me what is driving this sudden demand. Is someone stocking up? Speculators, most likely. Who's buying enough of this stuff to move the price so much? Hedge funds? China? Any ideas?

Look, oil went ballistic because futures traders thought there would be war or supply disruptions. Pure speculation.

Long-term, these things will go up bec. of demand from China.

Short-term, I'm waiting for a pull-back to get in.

Tim said...

Would one of you smarties please explaing the fundamentals for the price of gold - I'm dying to know.

Anonymous said...

powayseller, another possible way of looking at it is that fiat currencies, such as the dollar, are no longer seen as a safe storage of value.

john_law_the_II said...

I love people using the word bubble to describe the commodity markets. everyone wants to use the world bubble, and it's the bubble who won't use it for stocks, bonds or real estate.

repeat after me. a bubble is all-time highs. stocks were at all-time highs in 2000. housing is currently at an all-time highs. if you adjust commodities for inflation, they are still well below their lows. yes, commodities will likely have their 1987, but they'll most likely go up like the stock market did after that.

Anonymous said...

The Real Estate Bubble will burst, and Recession will follow.

Protect yourself from the real estate bubble now by going to:
www.MyRealEstateBubble.com.

Louis Hill, MBA

Anonymous said...

Damn, reading today's missive, I was pleased as hell to see the first and only time that I've been quoted in a public forum and I'm "anonymous"...

Perhaps I can enjoy the irony.

Anonymous said...

here is a link to an interview of Jim Rogers commenting on what Buffett said about commodities. For those not familiar with Rogers, he started his own commodities index fund in 1998 and wrote a book about commodities in 2004.

http://www.itulip.com/jamesrogers1.html

Anonymous said...

Guys, there are things Buffet doesn't know.

Silver flub aside, how much did Buffet lose last year betting against the dollar? A billion of them, or thereabouts?

In fact he was right about the fundamentals... but neglected to notice that 2005 was a magical congressionally-mandated window of corporate earnings repatriatization that gave the dollar a calendar-year shot in the arm.

This should have been obvious. Apparently, there are things Buffet isn't good at. Like he said: he sticks with companies that have earnings.

Ironically, his emphasis is shifting to foreign companies. I guess if you can't profit off the dollar's decline directly, you might as well do it indirectly!

He'll do just fine, but that doesn't make him the expert on everything.

As for the buzz surrounding commodities right now, I have been paying close attention. Right now, precious metals investing is still a completely alien thing to most people. I wouldn't admit it to anyone who isn't (a) doing the same or (b) is close enough to me to know I'm not crazy.

The mainstream press coverage seems to go something like this: "wow, look at these crazy gold bugs. Aren't they crazy? They think they can get rich with gold. Ok, some of them did, or are. But isn't that crazy? I mean... gold; its not exactly real estate."

I've seen a couple articles that sheepishly suggest putting a small fraction of one's portfolio in precious metals and/or commodities. Pretty sensible, I'd say.

The problem is, no one will be able to do it. There are thousands mutual funds in the U.S. of A, and a whopping total of about ten commodities funds.

I've looked into it; my own retirement plan has no commodities option =(

Anonymous said...

for john_law_the_ii

Bubble defined (nothing about being the Highest-Price-EVER)

5. Something insubstantial, groundless, or ephemeral, especially:
a. A fantastic or impracticable idea or belief; an illusion: didn't want to burst the new volunteers' bubble.
b. A speculative scheme that comes to nothing: lost money in the real estate bubble.

Anonymous said...

I'll settle it. YES. WE ARE IN A COMMODITIES BUBBLE.

You've lived through a stock bubble and now a real estate bubble... haven't you experienced enough bubbles to recognize one yet?

Anonymous said...

dlp:

A few things about your question on "fundamentals of gold".

Firstly, it is clear that the gold price was "gamed" throughout the 90s by large entities (such as most of the anglo-world's central banks). Anything more than a cursory examination of the production and demand numbers versus price action during that time period shows this clearly. So keep in mind that much of the rise to date can be explained by the end of this short-selling.

But not all. Not coincedentally, we are also entering a turbulent time in terms of energy and political stability.

The pyramid scheme known as the "US economy" is beginning to collapse, which leaves a global "reserve currency" vacuum. Objective #1 for the world's major financial entities is to preserve enough wealth to avert a disaster for themselves--a perspective which always makes gold look more attractive.

Why should gold be chosen over euroes or yen and so forth? Well, to some extent, these are also seeing greater demand, and will continue to do so. But I've seen convincing evidence (from itulip, I think) that recently the price action in gold changed from a mostly dollar-denominated rise, to a rise against all of the world's major currencies.

And I've seen a good explanation for this: no one wants their currency to appreciate too much, or it will destroy their export market. Want proof? just look at the fit the Canadian industry and their central bank's boss are throwing over the loonie's recent rise (we're almost at loonie:USD parity). See http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060509.wbuckaroo0509/GIStory/

(Also, here's a Jennifer Alban "Barron's" article pointing out that the middle east oil countries are mysteriously not putting as much money into dollars as they should be, given oil prices: http://br.endernet.org/~akrowne/econ/scans/barrons_may1_2006/alban_petrodollars.jpg ... I can't help but conjecture that our shiekh buddies have taken to stashing a few extra bars of the trusty old yellow metal in their vaults...)

So, what else...

Well, there's a bit of a history behind the typical price levels of gold versus other important assets, say, oh, oil. Adam Hamilton has written a nice series of essays entitled "Gold Boiling in Oil", which examines this historical relationship, and looks at the current action in gold and oil, makes a few conjectures about this relationship, and then predicts higher gold prices based on them.

The series gets a new installment about every two years, and the last was almost precisely two years ago, in May 2004:

http://www.zealllc.com/2004/goldoil3.htm

Hamilton points out that from mid-20th-century to the present time, the gold/oil price ratio has averaged about 15.4. If we were to base our "fair value" of gold on this ratio, then at today's $70/bbl crude, gold is worth a surprising $1,078.

I've also noticed from the charts that there seems to be a lag in the response of gold to non-shock oil prices, of about 1-2 years. So it is reasonable to surmise that we should actually reach this price in a year or two.

Of course, eventually speculation creates an overshoot. Accordingly, keep in mind that gold's historical peak is far above this $1000 number--more like $2200 in inflation-adjusted terms.

I've gone back and read the whole "Gold boiling in oil" series numerous times, studying it in detail, and Hamilton has largely been right in all of his predictions. Remember, the latest installment was *two years ago*. This stuff wasn't written last week.

But hopefully we'll get treated to a new installment soon.

OTHER SUGGESTED READING:

Here's an Eric Jensen article on gold from '01, written from a skeptic's perspective:

http://www.itulip.com/gold.htm

Here's an incredible historical piece on gold, empire, and monetary systems:

http://www.galmarley.com/framesets/fs_monetary_history_faqs.htm

Anonymous said...

"makes a few conjectures about this relationship, and then predicts higher gold prices based on them."

That's all you really needed say.

Anonymous said...

Re: commodities bubble

Let's say I go back to 1986 when MSFT is trading at a split-adjusted 10c, then fast forward a half decade to where it is trading at $1-$2. BUBBLE!!!!! Quick! Sell before I get my head chopped off!

Will the bubbleheads please study your fundamentals before declaring a bubble? How are you ever going to survive the coming currency crisis?

BTW, when the demand really hits, you can't just issue ounces of metal like you can shares of stock.

Anonymous said...

SIMPLE: we are at the beginning of the bubble. fundamentals have attracted speculators but we are nowhere near the peak.

1. we are still at historically low prices (ex: gold), adjusted for inflation, and that's a bad adjustment if you understand how the FED massages the inflation stat.

2. speculators currently not the vast majority of asset holders. primarily limited to pension and other institutional asset funds investing directly or indirectly via hedge funds. the really dumb money has not waded in yet (ex: your barber buying gold).

IMO, fundamentals still a large factor of current prices:

1. fiat US dollar being challenged by China (can we say trade deficit and central bank diversification away from the USD?)

2. FED stops M3 measurement, in what is obviously a sign that we will be entering an inflationary period

3. we are in a global growth spurt, with increased liquidity in global market across national and even international economies (ex: housing boom was not just the US, but UK, Australia, China etc)

Buffet basically described the growth cycle of a bubble, but while he did mention the huge jump in prices, he did not say nor imply in any way what stage we are currently in. fundamentals can drive the initial price surge, but given that we are not anywhere near the historical peak (and knowing that Buffet knows this), this is most likely not the latter stages of a bubble.

Additionally, long-term rates will only rise (the FED has not much control of this via their short term rate manipulations at this point, essentially Greenspan's conundrum in reverse), and besides further deflate or pop (take your pick) the housing bubble, take a wild guess what other effects that will have. Both locally and to countries exporting here.

BTW, when I worked for one of the largest private institutional asset managers (actually a sub-advisor), I remember them frantically trying to reposition themselves to focus on natural resource investments and derivatives. that was back in 1999.

Now, I work for a fund of hedge-funds pension and private asset managing entity and I can tell you right now that we do not think that the bubble is mature yet.

MMAfia

Anonymous said...

RE was hot. It isn't now. people have taken profits. Not everyone is a bagholder in this RE bubble and there is money in a lot of people's pockets. Stocks have been and still are hot. Problem is people remember the last stock declines and want to take their profits and safely stash them away. A big problem is the USA debt which isnot dropping. The foriegn govt's are getting their fill of dollars so the interest rates increase - many think the dollar is in real trouble. So as us guys who are getting in the 50s and 60s want to keep what we have what do we do? Can't get US securities which really do not hold up to inflation. Afraid of the stock market crashing from a terror attack or other dropping force. Foriegn currency? FIAT also.

I am in land (I live on it and the area I live in is expanding toward me), SOME PMs (silver through CEF), some international stocks, and some diversified stocks. So the PM is still rising as are my stocks as is my land value (I am not looking to sell in the next 15 years or longer), and as is the other stocks.

Simple - diversify, try to hedge against attack and dollar dropping, and did I mention diversify? Of course PMs are climbing because others are doing the same.

What I did not do was but little sh*tbox houses in cookie cutter new subdivisions that NOBODY in their right mind would live in - at outrageous prices. I can build a very nice custom 2800 sqft home with a 1300 ft wraparound porch looking over my beautiful view for $350K and live very comfortably. I have a private airstrip on the land and several hangars, with 3 nice planes in them - paid for.

BTW, 15 minute drive to my $100K very secure job. Clean air. Low taxes.

Why would anyone pay $750K+ for a sh*tbox and a long drive to work??? That is the bubble and that is the topic of this blog which is why I am here.

My $.02.

Anonymous said...

I had a relative yesterday and a colleague today ask me "how do you buy gold coins?". Although a tiny, anecdotal sampling, gold fever may be creeping into the general populace more quickly than the author thinks.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP