Wikinvest Wire

Friday Lite

Friday, September 15, 2006

Another consumer price report was released just a short time ago. It looks like it'll be smooth sailing from here on out, given the back-to-back deuces (actually, that would be point-deuces) rolled by core CPI as shown in the graphic below.
Recall that earlier in the year, the four consecutive readings of 0.3 caused quite a stir since it had previously been thought that all items that would ever go up in price had been removed from this index years ago.

Talk of modifying the index to counter rapidly rising rental costs, now that the housing market is swooning, will likely die down as core inflation appears headed back toward the hallowed level of two percent when measured on an annual basis.

Order has once again been restored and the inflation monster once again vanquished by the central bank. Whether or not there is any relationship between this event and the price that people actually pay for things is a separate issue.

Miranda Has A Blog

Miranda Edel heard that people were talking about the way of life she and her family have chosen to live as documented in Wednesday's post What Planet Are These People From? and she stopped by for a few minutes. She was kind enough to leave a comment with a few answers to some of the questions that others had asked.
Miranda also has a blog - Simple Living - that is well worth a few minutes of your time. The class exercise of counting the number of advertisements seen during 30 minutes of watching TV or while driving a car is instructive. Of course Tivo solves the problem of television commercials, but billboards are mostly just annoying.

They Shoot Central Bankers in Russia

In the news yesterday was this report of the gangland style killing of Andrei Kozlov, the Russian Central Bank's first deputy chairman. Also killing his driver, the two gunmen fled after the attack and are currently being sought.

While rarer than in the turbulent 1990s, contract killings of businessmen and bankers still regularly occur in Russia, where business conflicts often turn violent.

Vice Premier Alexander Zhukov said the shooting was likely linked to Kozlov's duties, and suggested the possibility of a connection with the Central Bank's revocation of licenses of unreliable commercial banks, the Interfax news agency reported.

They say that two-thirds of all U.S. hundred dollar bills are currently circulating in Russia. Aren't they going after the wrong central bankers?

They Ought to Shoot These Central Bankers

Or maybe some government officials, or maybe both. From a few weeks back in The Economist comes this report of the inability of some central bankers to solve the problem of inflation by removing zeros. If only it were that easy.
At the end of July the central bank devalued the Zimbabwean dollar (Z$) by more than half and then announced that the currency would also lose three zeros. This is the bank's latest idea to fight hyperinflation hovering around 1,000% a year—the highest in the world—and to attract cash into the banking system.
...
Spiralling inflation has forced Zimbabweans to use bags to carry cash: wallets are a distant memory. It takes time for cash machines to spit out the daily maximum of Z$250m—or Z$250,000 in new money—that people are allowed to withdraw, so queues have become common. Zimbabweans have become used to dealing in “bricks”, as piles of banknotes worth Z$10m are known. Businesses send their money by trucks to banks' special bulk-cash facilities.
It is unclear how the new money will compare with the old money when measured against toilet paper - a roll of toilet paper used to cost $1,500 (or maybe it was $15,000 or $1,500,000 - it's been a while), forcing the user to decide whether to actually purchase the more pliable grocery store item or just use the currency.

The Home of Inflation

It would probably be more accurate to say that the Federal Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe is Inflation Central, but, the Cleveland Fed has claimed that moniker for themselves. The irony of the screenshot below is probably completely lost on the web page designers at the Fed, similar to lost irony when phrases like "the Fed is fighting inflation" are heard.


Why would you ever have to fight something that you create? It's like a drug dealer who fights drug abuse but continues to peddle the stuff. Just don't cause inflation, then there will be no need to fight it, and certainly no need to have Inflation Central.

This site is actually chock-full of great economic data, it's just a little difficult to get past the main page in the inflation section.

Why Would Central Banks Not Sell their Gold?

From Reuters comes news that European Central Banks are indeed unloading their gold, partially explaining the recent plunge in the spot price of the barbarous relic. The surprising part of this story is that central banks on the continent will not meet their quota this year because the dufusses at the German and Swiss banks passed on their options to sell. Why would they pass?
Gold, which was trading around $580 an ounce on Wednesday XAU, had risen 25 percent a year for the last five years, boosting its attractiveness as an asset.

”The rise in price is a major factor” in explaining why central banks want to hold onto their gold, he said.

“One of the most important arguments (against holding gold) is that gold has no yield, but when the price doubles in three years you cannot say that it has no benefit.”
The German and the Swiss central bankers are clearly the brightest of the bunch, but you have to wonder how long this can go on. How long will it be before other central banks realize that maybe they should hang on to their gold bars. Taken to its logical conclusion, what happens when all the gold has left all the central banks and the gold price starts soaring? What do the central banks do then?

Time is Running Out

Mr. Market has presented commodity investors with a wonderful opportunity to buy up natural resources and related stocks at bargain prices. If you've grown suspicious of the job that central bankers have done in preserving the value of your money, maybe it's time to diversify your portfolio.
The lifetime rate guarantee offer over at Iacono Research expires this weekend. To begin a subscription, click here. For a free, no obligation two week trial, just send mail to tim-at-iaconoresearch-dot-com with the words FREE TWO WEEK TRIAL in the subject line.

New Charts at Yahoo! Finance

Have you seen the new charting software over at Yahoo! Finance? Here's a stock that's been in the IR Model Portfolio for some time now.


The new Yahoo! charts work great as long is they don't lock up your browser - they're still getting a few of the bugs worked out and have recently switched back to the old style charts, giving you the option to use the new ones, now labeled Beta.

Impressive Browser Share Statistics

With great pride it can be reported that the Firefox browser share at this blog is nearly three times the national average. If you haven't tried Firefox, give it a whirl - it has been known to raise IQs by twenty points within a single week.
Has Microsoft Internet Explorer figured out how to do tabbed browsing yet? Are they like three years behind on this one?

The Housing Bubble That Isn't

Did anyone else think it was odd that the Senate Banking Committee convened a hearing titled "The Housing Bubble and Its Implications for the Economy" and then the participants went on to explain that there is no bubble. According to this story, Thomas M. Stevens, president of the NAR (National Association of Realtors), set the record straight.
"Contrary to many reports, there is not a 'national housing bubble,'" said Stevens. "We were seeing home prices and mortgage debt servicing cost-to-income ratios increase to unhealthy levels in some housing markets, which precipitate an adjustment." Also contributing to the cooling housing market is an increase in mortgage rates of nearly one point, speculative investors pulling back and first-time buyers being priced out of the market.
This brings back memories of Alan Greenspan's testimony before Congress where he would deny the existence of a national housing bubble, instead citing areas of "froth". That is, many tiny bubbles, in places like Boston, San Diego, Florida, Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, Las Vegas and a few other major metropolitan areas.

Next week the Senate Banking Committee will take up the much more interesting topic of wealth creation technology - Calculated Risk: Assessing Nontraditional Mortgage Products.

The Malthusian Institute on Preparedness

This story from The Onion paints a frightening picture of the nation's preparedness for various end-of-the-world scenarios, which actually seem more likely with each passing day (depending on who you talk to).
Over 87 percent of Americans are unprepared to protect themselves from even the most basic world-ending scenarios, according to a study released Monday by the nonpartisan doomsday think-tank The Malthusian Institute.

Despite "more than ample warning" for the most likely means of worldwide destruction, less than one million American households have taken even the simplest precautions against nuclear shockwaves, asteroid impact, or a host of angels bearing swords of fire, the study concluded.

"Our survey of households in seven U. S. regions demonstrated that few citizens have bothered to equip themselves with fireproof suits and extinguishers to deal with volcanic upheaval, solar flares, or the Lord's purifying flame," Malthusian Institute director James Olheiser said. "Almost no one is prepared for a sudden shift in the Earth's polarity or the eating of the Sun and moon by evil wolves Skol and Hati during Ragnarok."
It shouldn't be surprising to learn that Wikipedia has entries for Skoll, Hati, and Ragnarok. The editors at The Onion probably meant Skoll and not Skol, the fight song of the Minnesota Vikings of the National Football League. Oops, this is starting to look like a paragraph at Wikipedia.

11 comments:

jmf said...

hello from germany,

here is a piece worth reading regarding the "rotten core"

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/09/rotten-core-rate-inflation.html

and here a shoing (to the fed) view on the core from the bank of england.

http://immobilienblasen.blogspot.com/2006/08/bank-of-england-zur-core-inflation.html

have a nice weekend

Anonymous said...

I liked when the Fed in Washington had that dopey eagle with the red, white, and blue clothes that was supposed to teach kids how the central bank works.

Mish's inflation monster looks like another attempt to brainwash young people into seeing one thing while believing another when it comes to rising prices. It probably wasn't intended to be that way, but that's the result.

Anonymous said...

The financial world has almost universally replaced reserves with derivatives. As they say on The Simpsons, "what could possiblie go wrong?!"

Anonymous said...

Tim, Morgan STanley has disappeared from your "Links" list. Any reason? I liked S. Roach and A. Xie.
Sincerely, Jim Clark

Tim said...

I was cleaning up my blogroll list for bloggers that asked me to add a link then stopped writing anything - I must have deleted that by mistake. I see Roach's most recent commentary is "Wither Commodities"...

Anonymous said...

Tim, Gentlemen,

Let me share some thoughts that've been bugging me. I agree with a lot of your analysis, and the problems of our society you point out are right on target.

And yet I wonder how the people buying commodities today are different from the "unsophisticated herd" of housing investors?

Since 2000, housing in SoCal has risen by, say, 150%. Still, most commodities have risen even more. Yet you argue that the housing has peaked and will probably fall (I agree) while commodities are in the early stages of the boom and have a lot further to go. Why? Let’s consider the arguments I’ve heard:

1. Limited supply, growing demand argument has been applied to both commodities and housing, and in both cases it is only partially true – unreasonable price will eventually slow down the demand.

2. The strongest argument IMO is inflation hedging. With the way the US has been spending, the dollar is likely to fall a lot further. But in this case, one can argue that buying an overpriced house (as opposed to overpriced commodities) with a still low fixed interest rate is a good inflation hedge too, since the monthly payment with fall in real terms together with the dollar.

3. Still early on in commodities, since they have not become the most popular mainstream investment/speculation vehicle the way housing has been. I think this is a strong argument. But we must allow for the possibility of different dynamics in different markets. In residential housing, individual buyers/investors drive demand. In commodities, it could be mostly Asian countries and hedge funds. Given the unprecedented amounts central banks and private equity have at their disposal now, could it be that they drove the entire bubble cycle all by themselves and on accelerated schedule, without the “help” of ordinary investors (who got into the commodities through their pension and mutual funds)?

What’s left? Oh, the subset of #1 -- China and India… Well, clearly they do increase the demand for commodities, just like immigration drives up the price for housing in SoCal. Like illegal immigrants, these countries are still relatively poor and their internal demand is strongly affected by the price. They are a huge factor but hard to quantify at this point (particularly since a lot of China’s demand still ultimately serves Western markets and so it is not new demand per se, it is just redirected from disappearing factories in the West).

Let’s not forget that your and most reader's financial interests are tied to commodities. Moreover, you are forced into cheerleading for them no matter what to help your investment site. It’s difficult to remain objective with all this pressure, even if one wants to.

Don't get me wrong, I really enjoy this smart and well-written blog, I am just trying to question and reality-check my beliefs. I’d be interested to hear your responses.

Tim said...

ingener,

I'll have some comments on this sometime in the next day or two, after I finish this week's newsletter - I may just make this the subject of a post next week. You have touched on a number of very important issues that I think represent common questions that many people may have regarding commodities, and I'm more than happy to share my thoughts.

Anonymous said...

Housing vs. commodities?

I'm sure Tim will have a lot of great analysis to offer. But, if you are concerned that commodities are already a bubble like housing, then you misunderstand what a bubble is (no disrepect intended). You need to go research and figure this out first.

Anonymous said...

gee
condo flipping versus people buying gold coins to sock away because they think the gubbmnt is really screwing things up and that people will eventually see that their money is not worth anythign more then the paper its written on
yeah, same thing

Anonymous said...

Roubini does a nice job here (and elsewhere) on why housing is a bubble:

http://www.rgemonitor.com/redir.php?sid=1&tgid=10000&cid=143482

Jim Rogers' Hot Commodities comes to mind as a primer on the state of commodity fundamentals.

Another good metric: how much exposure and variety can you get to real estate vs commodities in your 401k?

Tim said...

ingener,

I wlll be writing more on this subject but not for a few more days at least, so here are some comments.

0. The difference between people buying commodities today versus the "unsophisticated herd" of housing investors

- I don't think you can compare someone swept up in the real esate mania with someone buying commodities. Anybody and everybody have been involved with real estate in some way in recent years, yet just a tiny portion of the public is invested in any kind of commodities. It's reasonable to think that professional speculators have been heavily involved in both real estate and commodities, but your ordinary investor still has just a tiny exposure to commodities if any exposure at all. Based on the idea that you can't have a really big bubble without broad participation by the public, the rise in commodities doesn't even come close.

1. Supply/Demand - In the last five years, the U.S. housing stock has increased by over 6 million while the number of households has increased by only 3 million. I would not consider this to be limited supply, but rather speculative demand bidding up prices on the available housing stock. Energy and mine production have not increased in any meaninful way in recent years, commodity prices being driven higher by increased demand and a relatively fixed supply (unless of course you count central bank gold sales which would be the exact opposite of limited supply) - as prices rise, investment will be made to increase output, causing downward price pressure, but this is capital intensive and it takes many years to bring new production online.

This is the foundation of a commodities bull market - underinvestment in production leads to higher prices as a result of increasing demand that leads to overinvestment in production that results in falling prices. This process takes more than five years to complete - we have not seen any signficant increase in production for either energy or metals.

2. I've never understood the inflation hedging argument - put some portion of your cash allocation into gold so in case inflation rises at seven percent and the banks only pay five percent then you'll somehow come out better in the end? What do you say when gold has risen 25 percent per year for the last four years, yet "inflation" is only 3 or 4 percent? I agree that paying a low fixed interest rate for housing is a good idea, but buying an overpriced house is potential disaster if prices fall and you have to sell.

3. I think you are correct in everything you say here, except the part about ordinary investors getting into commodities through their pension funds and mutual funds. This is such a tiny share of what the participation could potentially be in the future given current dollar amounts of investable assets - $40 trillion in bonds, $15 trillion in equities, $100 billion in gold mining stocks, and $70 billion in commodity funds (or something like this). There are a lot of pension funds looking at commodities but very few that are involved in a big way.

Yes, I'm a cheeleader for commodities but it needs cheerleaders. I'm much more open-minded than most people about most things - that's how I ende up being a cheerleader for commodities.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP