Wikinvest Wire

Another Little Word

Sunday, December 17, 2006

This report of the Plunge Protection Team's visit to China contains news of another interesting choice of words by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. It seems that in monetary circles, the virtual peg of the Chinese currency to the dollar is viewed as a "subsidy" - that is, up until the time that Hank Paulson at Treasury finds out about it.

Bernanke, in a speech Friday after the conclusion of the talks, backed away from calling China's currency a subsidy for its exports. His written remarks, released before his speech at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, contained three instances of the politically charged word "subsidy."

The Fed described Bernanke's changes as "spontaneous," but observers speculated that he may have been advised, possibly by Paulson or his staff, to drop the term.

"Once you talk about subsidies, it escalates the debate," said Oded Shenkar, a management professor at Ohio State University and author of "The Chinese Century." "It's kind of an accusation," he said, with political and legal implications.

Chinese officials reportedly agreed in broad terms on the need for greater liberalization over time but declined to be pinned down to a timetable even as they acknowledged ongoing differences between the world's largest and fourth-largest economies.

That such differences remain is understandable because the actual situations of China and the United States are completely different," said Vice Premier Wu Yi.

China's leadership is wary of moving too quickly in light of the shaky banking system, growing wealth gap and mounting concerns about social instability.
Well, they should be wary given what happened the last time an emerging economic powerhouse in Asia agreed to let their currency strengthen. It was the Japanese Yen and the 1985 Plaza Accord resulted in it strengthening by more than 50 percent against the U.S. dollar in a period of just two years.

This augered in one of the most horrific booms and busts the world has ever seen and Japan has still not recovered after fifteen years. It's not likely that the Chinese will repeat this mistake, despite what a bunch of smart people from Washington tell them.

ooo

A double shot of cartoons from The Economist.


3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Japan's bust is, frankly, overblown.

I have an easy recipe to avoiding the same fate: don't ever, ever have a zero interest rate policy, or even diverge much on the downside from prevailing global interest rates. If you do, like Japan, you'll certainly succeed in producing liquidity, but it will go precisely everywhere you don't need it: outside of your own borders, fostering carry-trade-based speculation in other markets.

But in a sense, I think Japan actually did recover. Can anyone point to a substantial societal ill the country has been facing for the past decade and a half? Low inflation and GDP don't count as meaningful metrics. They certainly don't have conditions remininscent of some of the US's more severe recessions and/or depressions.

No, the reason Japanese politicians, and economists in general are down on Japan's fate is because they aren't "winning" in terms of the favored metrics, like GDP.

It's funny watching them pour more and more liquidity in and go nowhere, as it pours out of the country like a sieve.

Anonymous said...

I like the cute little guys behind the UN in the cartoon. Which one of them is in charge of having UN peacekeepers extort sex from children for food aid? Which of them is in charge of standing by while Hezbollah rearms itself in defiance of a UN resolution? Which of them was in charge of the aid program that Saddam skimmed billions from?

Oh, right, that last one is the flat guy in the second cartoon.

Anonymous said...

why does the UN building always remind me of the monolith from the movie 2001?

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP