Wikinvest Wire

What Good is the Carry Trade?

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Much of the blame for last week's shellacking of financial markets around the world has been attributed to the "unwinding" of the Yen "carry trade". That is, when hedge funds and other financial institutions closed out investment positions funded by money borrowed at low rates of interest from Japan.

After the Bank of Japan raised interest rates a few weeks back, the Yen strengthened and the higher borrowing cost combined with a narrowing exchange rate differential began to eat into investors' gains.

Spurred by a recession warning from Alan Greenspan and the plunge in the Shanghai Composite index last Tuesday, carry trade profits were promptly taken, resulting in the sale of stocks, commodities, currencies, probably a few paintings, and who knows what else.

The after-hours plunge of over $20 in the price of gold on the New York Access market last Tuesday is being attributed, at least in part, to the sale of more than six tonnes of gold bullion by the streetTRACKS Gold ETF (AMEX: GLD), a trading vehicle that has apparently become quite popular with hedge funds and other speculators.


The price of the metal had fallen only a dollar or two when the COMEX closed at 1:30 PM, but as of 4:15 PM, the gold ETF had lightened its load by a couple hundred thousand ounces. Clearly, there were few buyers for the supply being liquidated.

Similarly, high-yielding currencies in countries such as New Zealand and South Africa plunged as foreign currency positions, funded by the carry trade, were liquidated.

For the rest of the week, the rout was on for equity markets around the world, margin calls were made, and forced selling ensued.

The highly leveraged bets of hedge funds using cheap money denominated in the lowest yielding currencies once again wreaked havoc with financial markets.

When Rates were Low in the U.S.

Not more than a few years ago, in the aftermath of the bursting of the U.S. stock market bubble when the short-term interest rate was only one percent, the U.S. Dollar was the preferred funding source for the carry trade.

There was great trepidation in mid-2004 when former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, a staunch backer of hedge funds over the years, began his "baby step" interest rate normalization campaign that eventually saw short-term rates climb 425 basis points .

Though many expected some sort of disaster, there were few problems. However, interest rates rising at a snail's pace over a two year period emboldened borrowers around the world and at the top of the list of confident punters were buyers of real estate in the U.S.

Many of these loans are now going bad.

If not for the carry trade would interest rates in the U.S. have been raised at a faster pace avoiding some of the most egregious practices of the last two years in the U.S. housing market?

No one will ever know, but all of this prompts the question, "What Good is the Carry Trade?"

In comments yesterday in Greenwich, Connecticut, Assistant Treasury Secretary Anthony Ryan noted that, "few groups are more adept at identifying opportunities and moving capital around the world than those managing hedge funds."

But do they have to do it with money borrowed from countries with weak economies?

This distorts the entire exchange rate picture and only benefits hedge fund managers and their investors. There is no discernible improvement in the "allocation of capital" - it's just "asset shuffling".

More Bubbles

It seems that all the carry trade really accomplishes is a further "bubbleization" of the world economy. Some hedge funds will reap huge profits and others will fail disastrously. Some rich investors will get a little richer and some will lose out. Some pension funds will have huge surpluses and some will have to resort to plan "B" to fund retirements.

Meanwhile, emerging economies struggle to survive the torrent of carry trade money and markets become more volatile.

There is an enduring idea that if the "the market" sets the price of currencies, equities, commodities, and other assets, then this is somehow better. The market knows best. But if "the market" is dominated by hedge funds with easy access to cheap money, this can be more destabilizing than beneficial.

Now Hank Paulson is over in Asia trying to reassure everyone that things are going to be OK - that another meltdown is not in store.

Speculators have always played an important role in financial markets, but why must they be provided with such easy access to cheap money?

What good is the carry trade?

Full Disclosure: No position in GLD at time of writing, but the author owns many gold coins.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh, you know the answer to the question. The carry trade doesn't benefit the world economy or society in any way, so it does no real GOOD. This is the world we live in. The rich get richer and will continue to do so until the poor people storm the castle.

Anonymous said...

>> Full Disclosure: No position in GLD at time of writing.

Tim,

Looks like GLD trade is very much like currency trading. Buy at 65 and sell at 68 would be my trading pattern in GLD -- no long term holding....

Tim said...

Clarified the disclosures statement:

Full Disclosure: No position in GLD at time of writing, but the author owns many gold coins.

I don't want to give the wrong impression.

Anonymous said...

What good is the carry trade? To take wealth from the productive part of the economy and transfer it to the parasites in the financial world. After all, when they make their 'money', they spend it and bid up the prices of things that we in the productive world create. Our lost spending power is equivalent to the wealth they've taken.

What good is the gold standard? To protect the productive people from the parasites.

Greyhair said...

Just to offer an alternative view, it looks to me like the question of "what good is the carry trade?" could be asked of several other vehicles in the marketplace, i.e. short selling, day-trading, swing-trading, and the multitude other strategies to use the marketplace to make money. Sure it lends volatility, but that's just the way it works?

To seriously answer the question "what good is it". It's good for making money for those who utilize it. Obvious, yes. But since when has the market operated on any sort of socialist principles.

donna said...

Well the market used to operate for the benefit of the producers, to finance production. Now, the market operates to "make money".

This country and perhaps the entire world "financial market" has forgotten how to be productive.

Anonymous said...

In theory there is nothing wrong with the carry trade or any trade for that matter.

In reality what is wrong is that the people making these trades don't think that there is much risk in them. This results in them making bigger bets than they would otherwise make.

Therefore the question is why don't the funds that make these huge bets have any fear. Part of it is that they think that they can manage risk better and therefore take on these huge bets. But the real reason is that they know that if they run into any big problems the government will bail them out by giving them easy access to liquidity. If any thing bad happens (a la the S&Ls, LTCM or the dot com crash) the government will step in and turn on the presses.

Blaming these funds makes no sense. The purpose of these funds is to make money how ever they can. They can not be blamed for working for their own best interest (i.e. making money) within the framework that the goverment has setup.

If things start to blow up and the government doesn't step in then this problem of a huge carry trade now and in the future will take care of itself. But that isn't going to happen...

Anonymous said...

Leveraged money is inherently different than real money. For policy makers this can be a god send.

Where as real money would inherently fear inflation in holding money, leveraged money has no such fear. There only real concern is the cost of financing.

This has clear policy implications whereby the Fed gains much stronger control over the bond market.

That is why the Fed has been reluctant to turn on the regulatory screws on the Funds.

Anonymous said...

Nothing is wrong with the carry trade. The only issue is that the big boys get to borrow. Not folks like you and I. I wish I could borrow money at 0%. I would park the money in CDs yielding 5%.

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised at the misunderstanding of the carry trade. Some think that's it's just another type of investment.

When you borrow money from Japan at 0%, who's paying for it? The Japanese people, as their currency loses value.

When you buy US government bonds paying 5%, who's paying for it? The US taxpayer.

The carry trade is legalized theft.

Anonymous said...

"When you borrow money from Japan at 0%, who's paying for it? The Japanese people"

"When you buy US government bonds paying 5%, who's paying for it? The US taxpayer."

Yes, but whose fault is this?

It isn't the fault of the people doing the carry trade. They aren't the ones who pass the US budgets every year and force the government to sell debt. And it is not the people who are doing the carry trade who mismanaged the BOJ and the Japanese economy for the last 20 years.

The blame needs to go to the governments who create the rules, not those who are playing by them.

Anonymous said...

Governments may have created rules to make it legal to steal from Japanese currency holders and US taxpayers.

That does not make it moral.

Anonymous said...

I think there are many good hedge funds; and sophisticated hedging is a good idea.

However, it is reckless to "hedge" after borrowing to the point of insolvency; and one should always leave room for faulty risk exposure estimation. Very few hedge funds are actually "hedging" -- they're competitive "long-biased" funds.

Really what we have is a situation where everyone is doing proprietary trading because it's been such a bonanza for so long (this includes investment banks, not just hedge funds), and there are too many such operations simply because higher fees can be charged.

For example, while I'm bullish on silver, I'm wary of a silver "hedge fund" which is being started -- investing in just silver (how you can "hedge" with just one play is a mystery to me) and charging high fees.

Many of these are just highly-leveraged unregulated mutual funds that charge high fees and claim they are hedging when returns end up being poor and uneven.

Overall, all of this has completely changed market dynamics for the worst. Something like 2/3rds of market volume is now hedge funds and proprietary trading, and most of these entities are not innovative at all but are doing the exact same things.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP