Wikinvest Wire

On his departure, watch the gold price soar

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Having recently stumbled across this post from over a year and a half ago during a routine look at the site statistics for this blog, it was just too interesting not to share again.

------------------------------------
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2005

The Time Is Surely Not Far Off

As gold makes attempt after attempt to once again surpass and hold the $450 per ounce mark and then take out the $457 level that marked a new 18 year high last December, more and more commentaries about the yellow metal are popping up in all sorts of places. Somehow these recent commentaries are different.

It used to be that there were only two sides to the gold story - the story told by economists and the story told by gold bugs.

The economists would say that gold is a "barbarous relic" that pays no interest and has been relegated to its proper place as but a footnote in history - that today's financial wizards are wholly capable of managing fiat money and that the world is a better place without the restrictions on money creation that were in place when money was linked to gold.

The gold bugs would respond by pointing out that today's fiat money has no intrinsic value because it is backed by nothing other than confidence in the government and the central bank which issues it - that ultimately, it will revert to its intrinsic value because of promises politicians can not keep and the hubris of central bankers.

Today there seems to be a growing middle ground when it comes to gold. Some question the current relationship between the oil price and the gold price and note that it is far from historical norms. Others wonder why gold has nearly doubled in value since the technology boom went bust and real estate became the world's primary driver of wealth creation.

An excellent example of this new middle ground is this Buttonwood column that appeared in The Economist the other day. This excerpt makes clear that at least one economist at The Economist is a bit perplexed with his current understanding of gold's place in the world. The writer seems less perplexed about gold's future.
Just as inflation has, until now, lain low, and gold with it, America’s dollar has also been resisting arrest. Gold is after all a monetary metal, an alternative to the paper currency that replaced it at the heart of the world’s trading system, when times are tough. But they haven’t seemed tough so far. Despite America’s famous twin deficits, everyone else’s currency has been even less appealing, and big exporters such as China have had their own reasons for propping up the dollar. Now, as Katrina heaps billions on a national debt that is already close to $8 trillion, might that perception change? The time is surely not far off.

For at the end of the day, the price of gold reflects confidence, more than anything. When people are confident that their central banks will control inflation while permitting the economy to grow, when they believe that paper assets are worth something approaching their face value, they buy gold to wear but not to put in a safe. Alan Greenspan has achieved the remarkable feat of suspending disbelief in America’s gerrymandered finances for the past few years. On his departure, watch the gold price soar.
What do we think? We think everyone should own at least two one ounce gold coins so that occasionally they can be held in one hand - to appreciate the density and the weight, to admire the luster, and to hear the sound that is made when precious metal comes in contact with precious metal.

We also think a number of coins far greater than two would be preferable to just two.

As this is written today, gold has once again topped the $450 mark and looks to soon be making new 18-year highs. Then it's on to new 25-year highs in the $500 range, at which point, we sense that the world will start noticing gold in a big way, regardless of what economists say.

Got gold?
------------------------------------

Of course the reason why the timing of this post is so intriguing is the chart below - the red arrow indicates the original publication date, just before Ben Bernanke was nominated to replace Alan Greenspan, a few months before his term expired in January of 2006.

The economist at The Economist was right - not more than 45 days after Chairman Greenspan stepped down the gold price soared.

Don't be surprised if it soars again soon.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just coincident in time, I'm sure, but I bought it the day of Hurricane Katrina because I thought it would be highly inflationary.

Anonymous said...

I bought when it dipped below $600 last fall....didn't have the guts in June but by September I was a little smarter.

Anonymous said...

Tim,

What you doing going off talking about gold again. SHHHH!

Anonymous said...

where is a good place to buy gold coins?

Tim said...

Anon,

Earlier this year, I wrote a lengthy piece about buying bullion for subscribers to the investment website:

Buying Bullion

If you sign up for a free trial you can read it for free. I might publish it here at the blog someday.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP