Wikinvest Wire

Schiff vs. Luskin - an ugly draw

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

After listening to the effervescent Bob Pisani's absolutely giddy description of the triple-digit gain in the Dow yesterday, Peter Schiff was almost declared the winner over Donald Luskin in yesterday's CNBC face-off, but, in the end, it was just an ugly draw.

The video is available at both of their websites - the quality is much better at Schiff's Europac site but there's follow-up commentary on Luskin's blog.

This discussion (if you can call it that) actually does a good job at capturing the debate between bulls and bears on the near-term fate of both the U.S. economy and equity markets - no clear winners, both sides have good points, but neither side is interested in what the other side has to say.

Kind of like politics.

Here are a few highlights:


Luskin: It's the bears who are delusional. Here's the explanation for why stocks were up so much today. Pick up a copy of the New York Times, go to the opinion pages, look at Paul Krugman's column - he's got this end-of-the-world column about how the subprime mess is going to drag the whole economy down. He even quotes Bill Gross saying the same thing. If there was ever a buy signal, we got it. You want to buy 'em with both hands here my friend.


Schiff: If you want to lose money go ahead and do that, but you're right, you are delusional. We didn't get off to a good start. Look what happened to the dollar today - a 26-year low against the pound, a 20-year low against the Australian dollar. The dollar is breaking down, oil prices are reflecting the weakness of the dollar, we're breaking out in the price of oil. I think we're very close to a major collapse in the value of the dollar and that's going to send commodity prices, consumer prices, and interest rates spiraling, and that's going to compound the problems in the housing market that are just getting started.
It quickly degenerates into a shouting match from there.

Kind of like politics.

Favorite exchange:
Schiff: We are a burden that the world has to bear. The problem is that Americans are not producing enough, all we're doing is consuming and borrowing ... when the rest of the world lets the dollar collapse, and their currencies rise, all of a sudden consumer goods that people around the world can't afford suddenly become affordable and a lot of the capital that was squandered on American consumption is going to be available to them.

Luskin: Wait, wait, wait - this just can't go on. I feel like I'm debating Michael Moore here. America is not a burden on the world ... We are the engine of innovation for the entire world ... Because our money is so valuable, because our credit is accepted world-wide, billions of peasants world-wide are willing to work in poorly-lit, poorly-ventilated factories, just to get our paper money, because it's that precious.
Message to Luskin: Housing is worse than you think and there's no bottom in sight.

Message to Schiff: You're missing out on great U.S. energy and basic material stocks.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please, Tim, you are smart but sometimes you lose it. If the U.S. economy depends on energy and basic materials companies, we truly are screwed. That's Canada you're talking about, right?

Schiff is one of the smartest and bravest guys out there. He's been a flashlight in the darkness for a long time. Luskin is just a fool. Open your eyes and see.

Basically, Schiff believes everything you do, just said different.

Tim said...

I agree with a lot of what Peter says but have come to appreciate both sides of the argument. Those preaching the apocalypse have been wrong for many years now. Someday they'll probably be right but that may not happen for another ten years which is no reason not to have some Exxon Mobil in your portfolio.

Luskin isn't your typical Kudlowite either - he likes commodities and particularly gold as investments. Anyone counting on a collapse of the dollar is probably going to be disappointed - it's in nobody's interest (except gold bugs).

Anonymous said...

I invested $600k with Peter starting in early March, the last $100k of which was a few weeks ago.

In the FOUR MONTHS I have been with his firm, I have had a return of... 11%.

I have no complaints.

Anonymous said...

In defense of Tim's basic argument, since March 1st, the largest energy ETF XLE (mostly U.S. companies) is up 25 percent.

Anonymous said...

Don Luskin is the financial world's equivalent to Bill O'Reilly.

Anonymous said...

The bearish argument is consistently misrepresented by portraying it as "apocalyptic". Even apocalyptic bears are on to something---can the human race engineer mass folly? Its the rule, not the exception.

On my shelf is a book from 1978, called "After the Crash" by Geoffrey Abert. It caught my eye at an estate sale. It predicted a massive depression in the 1980s.

Initially, I found this amusing. What a fool, right? How could someone be so wrong.

But wait a minute. The late 70s and early 1980s were economically miserable. The 1980s had more bank failures than the Great Depression, which didn't end until the S&L collapse in the 90s. Inflation roared. Unemployment was high.

Arguably, we did have a depression. Was it the apocalypse? No, clearly. But Abert observed signs of rot, and knew the piper had to be paid. He was right, but he underestimated the capacity of people to cope, make the best of the situation, and patch things up for a while.

I expect more of the same in the coming years, though likely with reduced capacity to "patch things up" (we've already been running on a hack of FCB dollar recycling since 2001). The US is over-consuming and is in an unsustainable position relative to the rest of the world. The shift won't be pleasant---at least as unpleasant as the economic situation in the 70s and 80s, in my opinion.

But it won't be the apocalypse.

Anonymous said...

I'm a long time Euro Pacific Client. One of the firms biggest positions is Santos, which I believe has gone up nearly 5 fold, while paying 1/3 of it's earnings to the shareholders in the way of dividends. Peter is actually bullish on some domestic plays and says as much on his website (see link), but the foreign stocks have much better yields and are demoninated in stronger currencies.

http://www.europac.net/outlook.asp

Anonymous said...

Luskin (and so many others) turned out to be the delusional one. Of course, it's super easy to say that now in hindsight.

IMAGE

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP