Ben, are you sure you know what you're doing?
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
This morning's Ahead of the Tape column($) in the Wall Street Journal qualifies as another "Greenspan mess" sighting. Remember the rule - these two words within two paragraphs or 100 words of each other with total points awarded based on proximity.
Jon Hilsenrath argues it is far too early to judge Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke who celebrates his two-year anniversary as Fed chief this Friday.Ben Bernanke can't get a break.
Yes, he could be a hero indeed.
Two weeks ago, the Federal Reserve chairman's critics complained he was standing idly by while the markets sank, and they clamored for more-aggressive action. Last week, when he did what they asked, they called him a pawn of fickle investors. Had he done nothing, the same critics probably would have said he was ignoring the potential economic damage of a stock-market collapse.
In the end, all this hand-wringing about Mr. Bernanke's style and demeanor will be long forgotten if the Princeton professor gets his economics right. He's betting he can head off a recession by quickly lowering interest rates, possibly again tomorrow after the Fed meets. And he's betting he can do it without igniting inflation.
...
It probably doesn't help Mr. Bernanke that he has to manage the situation while his former boss, Alan Greenspan, and potential successor, Lawrence Summers, chime in with opinions from places like Davos and from book tours.
If the U.S. economy somehow gets out of this mess without a recession and with inflation under control, Mr. Bernanke will be a hero regardless of what market critics say now. Wall Street might give his policies a chance before writing him off.
Just like when Alan Greenspan was a hero for getting us out of that dot-com mess a few years back by inflating an even bigger asset bubble, if Ben Bernanke can find another suitable bubble to inflate, he too might stake a claim to the title "best Fed chairman ever".
Unfortunately, there are no good financial asset bubble candidates at the moment.
Of course there's alway the hard asset bubble that's been forming over the last couple years - the only problem with hard asset bubbles is that those prices show up in the inflation statistics.
While the obvious solution is to remove food and energy from the consumer price index completely - relegating overall inflation to the economic junk heap along with the M3 money supply statistic - that may not be politically possible due to the relatively large voting block of retirees who still have to put food on the table and heat in their homes.
And speaking of rising prices, writing in Bloomberg today, Craig Torres and Simon Kennedy correctly note that interest rates and inflation are pretty close to each other at the moment, but they seem to have not kept up with the latest economic data (Fed funds rate = 3.5 percent, December year-over-year inflation = 4.1 percent or compound Q4 annual rate = 5.6 percent).
Either that or they're ahead of the curve, already figuring that "inflation" is really "core inflation", which excludes rising food and energy prices.The Federal Reserve may push interest rates below the pace of inflation this year to avert the first simultaneous decline in U.S. household wealth and income since 1974.
Yeah, we'll deal with the repercussions later. This is an election year after all - we can't have home prices falling and unemployment rising at the same time.
The threat of cascading stock and home values and a weakening labor market will spur the Fed to cut its benchmark rate by half a percentage point tomorrow, traders and economists forecast. That would bring the rate to 3 percent, approaching one measure of price increases monitored by the Fed.
...
So-called negative real interest rates represent an emergency strategy by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and are fraught with risks. The central bank would be skewing incentives toward spending, away from saving, typically leading to asset booms and busts that have to be dealt with later.
Factor in a stock market that doesn't quite know which way to go at the moment and there's only one real solution - more easy money!
Ben, are you sure you know what you're doing?
6 comments:
Reader K.S. just wrote in to admonish me for not realizing that precious metals are the perfect solution to the Fed's problem of finding another bubble to inflate:
"A gold bubble would be perfect because its price does not show up in the inflation stats. It is now easily traded on many exchanges around the world. People can buy and sell to their heart's content, taking out some cash every now and then to fund even more overconsumption... They will feel wealthier all along the way as the POG goes to $1,000, $1,500, $2,000, $3,000 and higher. Economists don't pay attention to the "barbarous relic" anymore anyway and politicians could care less. It's the perfect solution!"
Like I wrote here a couple of weeks ago regarding gold: Chrysomania! It's coming.
On another note, Evans-Pritchard is actually defending the three-quarters cut.
Ambrose E-P writes:
"The trigger for the Fed action was the move on Friday by Fitch to strip the US monoline insurer AMBAC of its `AAA’ rating, with the mounting risk that the rating agencies would soon downgrade its bigger peer, MBIA.
Why does it matter? Because they have guaranteed a large part of that $2.4 trillion bond market.
If they lose their AAA ratings, all the bonds that they have insured will lose their ratings pari passu. This would force a large number of pension funds and institutions under strict investment rules to sell their bonds, setting off a cascade of sales with no obvious buyers in sight.
The effect could easily have been – and may still be – a second lethal leg to the credit crisis, with vast losses. This could all too quickly lead to a run of bank failures."
Full article: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/business/ambrosevanspritchard/december07/thefeddidnotpanic.htm
Tim, what's your take on that?
Gold bubble doesn't do a lot for general economic stimulus. That was "tried" in 1980. It also tends to be accompanied by uncomfortable press coverage about the failure of the dollar, and inflation.
The whole "we might see negative real interest rates" thing is maddening. I guess the Fed's mission of illicitly substituting core inflation for the CPI is accomplished.
BTW I "defend" the cut, in a sense. The Fed was merely moving the target rate to reflect the actual level of Fed Funds. In fact, by having the rate higher than the Fed Funds market "wants", they were actually tightening before.
Of course, not allowing the market to set the interest rate itself, as well as large-scale intervention in the bond market, are the biggest causes of this mess.
Bernanke is hoping the U.S. avoids a recession while sticking foreigners with the pain. It's worked so many times before. There's already whispers of a dollar bottom as the U.S. takes the lead heading into the next business cycle. Once he gets out in front, he can raise rates ever higher, using a strengthening dollar to cool inflation and cutting money supply for a recession in time for the next Presidential election.
I always thought the criticism that the Fed cut in order to try to save the stock market was a little unfair - the "rogue" trader story made things that much worse.
Yes, it's early, but I'm going to go ahead an nominate "monoline" for the word of the year in 2008 - just like "subprime" was in 2007
Post a Comment