Wikinvest Wire

Anna Schwartz doesn't like Bernanke either

Sunday, October 19, 2008

When Anna Schwartz last appeared in these pages, she was pointing her 92-year old finger at former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan for having been largely responsible for the current mess we find ourselves now immersed in.

She famously noted, "There never would have been a sub-prime mortgage crisis if the Fed had been alert. This is something Alan Greenspan must answer for".

So far, no answers have been forthcoming and it is unlikely that any ever will.

In this piece from yesterday's Wall Street Journal, the co-author of the definitive account of how Federal Reserve policy mistakes turned the 1929 stock-market crash into the Great Depression - "A Monetary History of the United States" - had a few more unkind words for Mr. Greenspan, then laid into current Fed chief Ben Bernanke as well.

Some excerpts:

How did we get into this mess in the first place? As in the 1920s, the current "disturbance" started with a "mania." But manias always have a cause. "If you investigate individually the manias that the market has so dubbed over the years, in every case, it was expansive monetary policy that generated the boom in an asset.

"The particular asset varied from one boom to another. But the basic underlying propagator was too-easy monetary policy and too-low interest rates that induced ordinary people to say, well, it's so cheap to acquire whatever is the object of desire in an asset boom, and go ahead and acquire that object. And then of course if monetary policy tightens, the boom collapses."

The house-price boom began with the very low interest rates in the early years of this decade under former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan.

"Now, Alan Greenspan has issued an epilogue to his memoir, 'Time of Turbulence,' and it's about what's going on in the credit market," Ms. Schwartz says. "And he says, 'Well, it's true that monetary policy was expansive. But there was nothing that a central bank could do in those circumstances. The market would have been very much displeased, if the Fed had tightened and crushed the boom. They would have felt that it wasn't just the boom in the assets that was being terminated.'" In other words, Mr. Greenspan "absolves himself. There was no way you could really terminate the boom because you'd be doing collateral damage to areas of the economy that you don't really want to damage."

Ms Schwartz adds, gently, "I don't think that that's an adequate kind of response to those who argue that absent accommodative monetary policy, you would not have had this asset-price boom." Policies based on such thinking only lead to a more damaging bust when the mania ends, as they all do. "In general, it's easier for a central bank to be accommodative, to be loose, to be promoting conditions that make everybody feel that things are going well."

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, of all people, should understand this, Ms. Schwartz says. In 2002, Mr. Bernanke, then a Federal Reserve Board governor, said in a speech in honor of Mr. Friedman's 90th birthday, "I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again."

"This was [his] claim to be worthy of running the Fed," she says. He was "familiar with history. He knew what had been done." But perhaps this is actually Mr. Bernanke's biggest problem. Today's crisis isn't a replay of the problem in the 1930s, but our central bankers have responded by using the tools they should have used then. They are fighting the last war. The result, she argues, has been failure. "I don't see that they've achieved what they should have been trying to achieve. So my verdict on this present Fed leadership is that they have not really done their job."
How could you possibly argue with a sweet old lady like Anna?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


George Galletly said...

It is a source of amazement that some dear old soul, Anna Schwartz, can and has put her finger right on the course of all of the present day financial problems and yet all of the so called Fed 'brains' simply don't get it.

However,It would appear to me that the actions of the Fed are still setting the US of A up for a serious recession/depression by virtue of the excessive printing of "Non-backed" $US.

We shall see, no doubt, soon.

concerned, George

StockMongerCom said...

How has that inflationary mumbo jumbo been working for ya? You would have lost a load of money in stocks, commodities, and real estate. The trend is deflation until proven otherwise. This is what happens when the stock market is a derivative of real estate, commodities, and currencies that hold worthless IOUs. The broad deflationary effects of worthless IOUs being cleaned out of system by systemic paralysis is quite evident.

  © Blogger template Newspaper by 2008

Back to TOP