Wikinvest Wire

Housing, tax credits, and realtors

Thursday, October 22, 2009

So, the home buyers tax credit is in the news again and it's becoming quite controversial...

Proponents would like to see the program extended well into next year and have the credit expanded to $15,000 (or more), removing the first-time home buyer requirement which, by the way, really didn't restrict this to new home buyers at all, just those who hadn't owned a home in the last three years.

The most cogent argument against the government providing expanded subsidies for its citizens to buy property in a sinking real estate market is that the cost per incremental home sale would jump to, by some estimates, almost $300,000.

You see, most people who took advantage of the first tax credit would have purchased a home anyway, so the government expense per "incremental sale" tends to soar.

However, since the total cost of the current program and the proposed new one would only be in the tens of billions of dollars, rather than the hundreds of billions or trillions of dollars that Congress has become accustomed to while dealing with banking bailouts and federal budget deficit, it's hard to imagine that anything other than a huge public outcry will prevent the program from surviving well into 2010.

In an effort to offset some of the negative press about the program - its relatively low "bang for the buck" and allegations of fraud in the hundreds of millions of dollars that include claims being filed for those who don't qualify, most notably by a four-year old - the National Association of Realtors and the National Association of Home Builders have joined forces, taking out a full-page ad in yesterday's Wall Street Journal claiming that extending and expanding the wildly popular program would do the following:

  • Create 350,000 new jobs
  • Inject more than $28 billion into the US economy
  • Generate $12 billion in additional tax revenue
It's hard to argue with how nice it would be to create that many jobs and provide such benefits to both the US economy and government, however, it also would have been nice to have some sort of note in an advertisement (one that likely cost upwards of $250,000) as to how those figures were determined.

A simple asterisk with a reference to a white paper or website would have made the numbers much more convincing, particularly in light of figures being provided by those who oppose an extension.

Then again, why shouldn't we just trust the home builders and realtors?

The arguments for extending the home buyer tax credit program are universally the same. It supports a struggling housing market and, as we've heard many times before, until the housing market recovers, the broader economy will not recover.

Just once it would be nice to hear some policymaker or some real estate industry professional say that, in order for the economy to stabilize, home prices must revert to more normal levels - say, levels that are supported by rents or wages under normal financing terms - rather than the familiar refrain that home prices must simply stop falling.

It really paints the wrong picture about what is going on in the nation's housing market if, by historical measure, homes are still overvalued by a large margin and the government takes extreme steps to support those valuations.
IMAGE Including freakishly low mortgage rates - under 5 percent for a 30 year fixed-rate loan as of last week - and low or no money down loans from the FHA and USDA (yes, the USDA), the US government has created many of the same conditions that were present when the housing bubble was at its peak.

The only thing they're doing different this time is verifying income.

With many respected analysts calling for home prices to continue to decline through 2010, efforts by the government to prop up the housing market through tax credits may end up backfiring over the long run.

Since housing bottoms are normally extended affairs, usually lasting for years, this one likely to persist even longer commensurate with the size and duration of the boom that preceded the bust, this program has the potential to set the housing market back for many years.

The reason?

Once the tax credits, low interest rates, and low down payments go away, homes that seem quite affordable today could all of a sudden turn out to be quite expensive.

Pushing interest rates back up two or three percentage points, requiring 10 percent down, and not offering the carrot of a $8,000 or $15,000 tax credit will, all of a sudden, transform a house that once looked cheap into something that is prohibitively expensive.

Under normal market conditions, that would make prices fall even more.

Toss in the realization by hundreds of thousands of 2009-2010 home buyers that took advantage of this government largess only to watch the value of their homes continue to decline - duped by the government it would appear - and homeownership might be set back for another decade.

Like most other aspects of the financial market rescue that has been going on for the last year or so, this appears to be another case of throwing money at a problem and asking the hard questions later (or not asking them at all).

How long can we continue to operate like this?

We'll find out soon enough...

As for our personal housing situation, we've been renting for the last five years and see no reason to stop doing so now.

Thankfully, not only do we still have quite a ways to go on our latest one-year lease, but we're far from decided on where we want to call home for the rest of our lives and both of these factors are helping to make any near-term house purchase decision quite an easy one.

Next year is another matter - with or without the help of Uncle Sam's help.

While visiting an open house yesterday, the anxious sales agent made sure (in an annoying sort of way) that we knew the home buyer tax credit will soon expire.

[Note to realtors: We are likely the exception to the rule, but, attempting to instill a sense of urgency will forever preclude our doing business with you.]

Sometimes I feel sorry for these people.

As was typical yesterday, a sales agent got the best of all possible answers from the standard queries - we sold our California home years ago and we now rent in the area, looking to buy - and must have felt flush with desire for a quick sale, spurring memories of a bygone era.

We probably should've told her that we definitely won't be buying anything for at least another nine or 10 months, perhaps much longer, and it may not be here.

But we didn't. We just said thank you.

Bookmark and Share

10 comments:

BC real estate said...

Hello. As the housing situation in the US is critical (and won't be much better in Canada shortly) I understand that a reform is really needed. On the other hand, the whole country is in debt and the government is spending more and more money on reforms which won't probably have any effect. I'm afraid that if the Fed continues this way the US will end up with its economy totally ruined.
Take care,
Jay

Anonymous said...

no 3 year limit, sounds like ripe for more fraud, just what we need. I buy a home, sell to wife, sell to daughter, sell to son, sell to me, repeat. Money maker churning out $30k/transaction. This is exactly the fraud the banks are playing with the "save the homeowner" programs going on now. USA of Fraud. I'm so proud.

Tony S said...

Allegations of fraud?

You mean like the many ones cited in the Washington Post article that came out today, "Report finds thousands of irregularities in home-buyer tax credit."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/22/AR2009102200812.html?hpid=topnews

But What do I Know? said...

This is off the subject, Tim, but a couple of years ago you did an article on buying gold (physical gold)--what to look for in a dealer, etc.

Can you update or repost this?

Thanks;

Tim said...

Send me your email address and I'll send you a rather lengthy article called "Buying Bullion".

Anonymous said...

Modestly priced homes are selling well, it is the zoning mandated McMansions that are not selling. They are just too big to ever be affordable to the median person. Thus the attempt to subsidize McMansion sales by forcing the taxpayer to pony up for part of the price. If 15 doesn't work, next they will want 30.

The problem is the mismatch between supply and demand. Central planning doesn't work, and many areas have centrally planned home sizes. Let the free market set home sizes, interest rates, etc... and capitalism will match supply and demand automatically.

Anonymous said...

Bullion is great in most states, but some states charge sales tax on bullion. This expense prevents a reasonable profit.

gta mls said...

I'll be interested to see other progressive analyses of the stuff Tim is talking about...I don't feel I know enough to really evaluate it either, but it sounds important.
Many solutions come at first with years of trying...
Julie

Hanney said...

Everything about real estate now has become so complicated and controversial. We could only hope that things will go back to normal in the soonest time possible. We just need a miracle. Thanks for sharing. By the way, I know a real estate coach who could also help many in the real estate industry make money despite the current crisis.

  © Blogger template Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP