Pay and Pray
Sunday, October 15, 2006
This story from Inman News is appropriate for a Sunday, as millions of Americans seek to bolster their faith in what they know to be good and true - home equity. As many have come to find out in 2006, there are two very different types of home equity - positive (the good kind) and negative (the bad kind).
Here's an example of the bad kind:"I work for a company that is on the decline, so I decided it was prudent to seek employment in another area. I have accepted a position elsewhere but now face a problem. I owe about $20,000 more on my current home than what it can sell for due to declining market values in my area, and I don't have the assets to make up that difference."
That last line is a classic - building home equity the old-fashioned way.
When you sell your house, you must pay off all liens on it — all mortgages including home equity lines of credit and any tax or mechanic's liens. If you don't retire all existing liens, you can't convey good title to a buyer, which means you can't sell.
You cannot escape this trap by transferring an existing lien to another property. Liens apply to a particular property and can't be transferred to another one without the permission of the lender, which is not going to happen.
Since the letter writer can't buy a new house unless he can sell his old one, his only recourse is to re-enter the rental market — as a tenant in the new area and as a landlord in the old one.
Negative equity can develop from a decline in local real estate values, as it did in the case of the letter writer, but that is not the only cause.
Home buyers who make no down payment have negative equity when they move in. And if they had to sell immediately, they could not repay the loans out of the sales proceeds because of the transaction costs. The sales commission alone runs 3% to 6% of the price. Most home buyers realize this but expect that price appreciation will bail them out, which doesn't always occur.
Lenders are supposed to be more worldly and wiser, but in fact, they are caught up with the expectation of appreciation just as much as borrowers are.
What can a borrower with negative equity do? Not much. You hunker down, pay your mortgage on time, pray that nothing happens that will force you to move and wait for appreciation.
And what if that doesn't happen?
Then you may be forced to build equity the old-fashioned way: by paying down your mortgage.
4 comments:
what a concept. it is almost a revolution..... :-)
"Then you may be forced to build equity the old-fashioned way: by paying down your mortgage"
could be a shock to a lot of homeowners.........
I read in one of the blogs (Calculated Risk?) that lenders are sometimes willing to negotiate final terms on a negative-equity mortgage like this.
The reason is that it's better for the bank to either have an unsecured loan or take the immediate loss than to have someone eventually default on a loan and get stuck with a piece of property that's depreciating in value.
It can't hurt to ask.
Housing's done; stick a fork in it!
Move-ups constitute most of the market, but you can't trade up (or down) negative equity. Since homeowner's equity as a percentage of their mortgage has actually decreased during the boom, there will be no equity (thus no buyers) left once the phantom gains evaporate.
What about those homeowners that actually own their homes outright? Most likely retirees who paid them off simply so that they could stay put forever.
Housing's done; stick a fork in it!
Move-ups constitute most of the market, but you can't trade up (or down) negative equity. Since homeowner's equity as a percentage of their mortgage has actually decreased during the boom, there will be no equity (thus no buyers) left once the phantom gains evaporate.
What about those homeowners that actually own their homes outright? Most likely retirees who paid them off simply so that they could stay put forever.
p.s.: Apologies if this posts twice.
Post a Comment